I think it's likely because they're sold on the double top tube thing for
larger sizes, and thus recommend one of the other models for the tall rider...
Steve
-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com]on Behalf Of happyriding
Sen
I look at the Toyo blog and puzzle over the Google versions of the
Japanese comments, and it looks like they have a strong domestic
market and make a really wide variety of frames. So, I hope &think
Japanese builders will do just fine. Skills will always do well, and
they have skills. I love what o
I wonder if the 64, 66, and 68 sizes of the Atlantis will be available again
for the ones made at Waterford.
-Original Message-
>From: jose
>Sent: Mar 31, 2010 7:28 PM
>To: RBW Owners Bunch
>Subject: [RBW] Re: Something I didn't know about the Atlantis
>
>Who knows - we could see Japa
I say if the $1000 difference is manageable, the Atlantis is the way. At times
I'd recommend the AHH, but if some touring or offroad is the plan, the Atlantis
can't be beat for maximum versatility. It's my oldest Rivendell (from 2001),
and it's (metaphorically) that best old friend with whom yo
Mark told me that the H is not as stout as the A, but, for $1K frame + fork,
that's what I'd choose unless I wanted to run tires fatter than 40 mm wif
fenders, in which case I'd look closely at the Hunquapilar.
Hell, that is what I *did* choose!
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:41 PM, cyclotourist wrote
Don't forget the Hillborne. You have lots of options... :-)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:00 PM, doug peterson wrote:
> William:
>
> No, you weren't crazy to get that impression. There was something a
> while back (maybe on the Atlantis page, maybe a knothole post, not
> sure) about getting the la
