I'll chime in here. My wife have feet that are just a bit wide, not quad-E
or anything, and found we really like using Xero shoes. Good enough width
for us, nice slim heel counter fit, and most important to us is that
there's room for the piggly wiggly toes to spread out. Lots of flex, and no
n
I bought the Giro Rumble recently for dirt cheap as a sleek MTB shoe. The
aren't the widest but also not nearly as narrow as everything else I've
tried. They are kind of cheap feeling and squeaked a bit when I first got
them but I'd give them 1 thumbs up from my EE wide feet. I took a black
sha
I have 13EEE shoes normally. The Keen Austin’s work well for me.
I do wish Keen would tell me which other shoe is made on the same last. But
they don’t.
For road shoes I use the Mega Sidi. Both in the road and mountain.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:43 AM Eric Marth wrote:
> Some great recs and idea
Sorry I seem to be replying to two threads and am not sure what has been
said, so sorry for any redundancies. I would recommend a simple shoe cover
if the cold is due to wind going through your shoes. For colder weather,
there are neoprene booties shoe covers that work very well in blocking wind
Hey,
as far as toe over lap, it was a fear of mine but, really, it has not
been a problem. I have not moved my saddle yet... I can say that the
pedals look odd but feel great, really connected to the bike, I can push
hard with no pain. It is a shame that they charge so much for them but
if they
I didn't see a price--how much?
> -Original Message-
> From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:rbw-owners-
> bu...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael_S
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:17 PM
> To: RBW Owners Bunch
> Subject: [RBW] Re: Shoes
>
> wow I really like the Tourer m
I have a pair of Reynolds British made shoes. Mine are an older style than
heir current offerings with a sole that is too flexible for long distance
riding in non-platform pedals. Very well crafted. The new ones appear to have
a beefed-up sole. Bear in mind that a UK size 12 is equivalent to
Anybody have Exustar's in 49 they want to part with?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: PATRICK MOORE
Sender: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:10:16
To:
Reply-To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re:
bunch@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:02:22
To:
Reply-To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Shoes
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Michael_S wrote:
> It's amazing that these types of shoes
> http://www.vittoria1976.it/1976series_en.html
>
> ar
: Shoes
With bike shoes, I (size 13EE) always feel like I'm being told by the
manufacturer, "No, you with big feet are not allowed to ride bicycles with us."
-Original Message-
>From: Tim McNamara
>Sent: Jan 18, 2011 4:02 PM
>To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.co
With bike shoes, I (size 13EE) always feel like I'm being told by the
manufacturer, "No, you with big feet are not allowed to ride bicycles with us."
-Original Message-
>From: Tim McNamara
>Sent: Jan 18, 2011 4:02 PM
>To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
>S
Amen, Tim. Baby needs new size 48 shoes here, too...
What is the collective Bigfoot doing for smooth-stiff-soled footing
these days (platform/clips-n-straps) anyhow? I've had to revert to the
dread clicky Shimanos for rides of any real distance recently, after
fatal leather shoe failure...
=- Joe
http://store.velo-orange.com/index.php/exustar-srt707-touring-shoes.html
I have a pair of these, and they are not bad -- not wonderful wrt
comfort and fit, but not bad at all for $100, and they look normal.
AND, they are not blowing them out for $45.
Please don't bring back the Vittoria whites!
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Michael_S wrote:
> It's amazing that these types of shoes
> http://www.vittoria1976.it/1976series_en.html
>
> are coming back in style.
To bad none of them are ever made big enough. Don't Italians ever have size
48-50 feet?
--
You received this message becaus
I use the se for mountain biking on my dual suspension. Want to be
firmly engaged to the bike when it's bouncing all over the place or
when struggling to keep pushing on a very steep uphill.
Cannot stand being clipped on the Rivendells and love the ability to
move my foot around and find the sweet
Question 'bout clip 'n' strap pedals: one reason I changed back to
clipless is that, at least on the narrow RX-1 and Wellgo track pedals
I was using, my feet would migrate sideways and end up rubbing
(especally my right foot bunion) on the admittedly very straight
up-and-down Cyclotourist and Stron
I agree; I feel insecure without some sort of retention.
Interesting: I went back to clipless (SPD and Look) on my two Rivs,
both fixed gears, and find, even now, after a year, that getting into
the clipless pedals is harder than getting into clips and straps, even
using slotted cleats. (The SPDs
I ride in cheap sneakers.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jeff, KC MO wrote:
> I have a pair of Axo (?, can't tell for sure from the logo) that I
> bought at a bike swap meet for $10 with stiff soles and no provision
> for SPD. They look like skate shoes but are perhaps the best bike
> shoes I
For me the magic formula has turned out to be the Keen Coronado Cruiser (that's
the bike specific version) for summer and warm weather and I have just
discovered the North Face Snow Sneaker II for cold and wet weather riding.
There's obviously no snow in the Bay Area, but when I start my 16 mile
Nope, the bike-specific Keen Coronados i've got are cleat-free (no place to
attach them).
Keen does make similar shoes with cleat-attachments, and sandals like that too,
but the bike ones I'm talking about are just less flexy in the sole and upper
than the lighter-weight canvas Coronados.
+1 on Keens.
I've got two pairs of Keen Coronados; one canvas pair, and one "bike" pair
that's heavier material (suede?) with a stiffer sole.
both work fine for cycling on Grip Kings, Sneaker Pedals, etc. and allow my
wide feet plenty of room with the enclosed toe-box.
The bike-specifc ones ar
21 matches
Mail list logo
