That's exactly the point, isn't it? Makes great sense.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Chris Burgess wrote:
> A bike that can go fast but does not look like it needs to (if that's
> makes any sense)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch"
Thanks everyone. I went ahead and put the Scrap Deluxe up for sale. It's a cool
bike and a great ride but I think a Sam is going to be a more flexible bike for
me. I like the idea of a vintage steel bike but I know nothing about building
or restoring a bike plus the Pashley Guv'nor satisfies my
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 10:02 -0800, charlie wrote:
> I see your point Steve and don't necessarily disagreefor me at 257
> right now, two top tubes seems fine. In fact, the Sam feels more
> lively than my Surly Trucker. I own a standard diameter high end 80's
> race bike with Columbus SL and it f
I see your point Steve and don't necessarily disagreefor me at 257
right now, two top tubes seems fine. In fact, the Sam feels more lively
than my Surly Trucker. I own a standard diameter high end 80's race bike
with Columbus SL and it flexes noticeably (for me) I only ride it on smooth
roa
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 13:02 -0800, charlie wrote:
> Yea Marc's bike is typical.weight wise. Not sure what my double
> top tube Sam weighs probably 8 ounces more though. The Sam in my
> opinion isn't 'overbuilt' or 'heavy'. I think the whole weight thing
> is a little over emphasized and somethi
