On Aug 29, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Bill Connell wrote:
>> The software analogy is flawed, because the vast majority of software
>> users don't maintain and modify their own apps, but they certainly can
>> work on their own bikes.
>
> The analogy
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Jim,
> I have a burley tandem with a threadless headset/stem and having to
> move it around to get the bars up was a giant pain in the ass.
>
> I had a bianchi castro valley, same thing, In general, I've found that
> since getting a rivendell t
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Bill Connell wrote:
> The software analogy is flawed, because the vast majority of software
> users don't maintain and modify their own apps, but they certainly can
> work on their own bikes.
The analogy is apt here. A lot of folks on this list do work on their ow
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> I have a burley tandem with a threadless headset/stem and having to
> move it around to get the bars up was a giant pain in the ass.
>
> I had a bianchi castro valley, same thing, In general, I've found that
> since getting a rivendell that hea
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
wrote:
> Seth: I think you're making far too much of the difficulty of
> adjusting bar height on threadless steerers. I have seen this rumor
> perpetuated again and again, but it simply isn't true, in my
> experience. On all my threadl
Seth: I think you're making far too much of the difficulty of
adjusting bar height on threadless steerers. I have seen this rumor
perpetuated again and again, but it simply isn't true, in my
experience. On all my threadless bikes, I have enough steerer that I
can move the bars a cm or even an inch
ppropriate design consideration, or at least an
> option.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
> *To:* RBW Owners Bunch
> *Sent:* Sun, August 29, 2010 12:41:48 AM
> *Subject:* [RBW] Re: WTB: midge, junebug, woodchipper, etc
>
> Seth
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
wrote:
> Seth makes a good point, in that many Riv customers and aspiring Riv
> customers prefer the classic quill aesthetic, and maybe Grant has
> decided that filling this niche is an important part of the RBW
> business model. But th
Subject: [RBW] Re: WTB: midge, junebug, woodchipper, etc
Seth makes a good point, in that many Riv customers and aspiring Riv
customers prefer the classic quill aesthetic, and maybe Grant has
decided that filling this niche is an important part of the RBW
business model. But threadless steerers have
Seth makes a good point, in that many Riv customers and aspiring Riv
customers prefer the classic quill aesthetic, and maybe Grant has
decided that filling this niche is an important part of the RBW
business model. But threadless steerers have been mainstream long
enough now, that even retro-grouch
Why not?
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
> wrote:
>> Time for Riv to go threadless!
>>
>>
>
> Let's not have that happen. I really don't care for threadless very much.
>
>
> -sv
>
> --
> You received this message
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
wrote:
> Time for Riv to go threadless!
>
>
Let's not have that happen. I really don't care for threadless very much.
-sv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To po
Time for Riv to go threadless!
On Aug 28, 12:23 am, Michael_S wrote:
> my understanding is 31.8 only. Which does not leave any quill stem
> options. we will have to use one of those adapters with a threadless
> stem.
>
> ~Mike~
>
> On Aug 27, 9:14 pm, cyclotourist wrote:
>
>
>
> > Are they goi
The Woodchipper is designed to be ridden in the drops. With the hooks
about even with saddle height. At least that's my preference.
These bars do not have any grooves. Probably intentional with the
fairly funky bends.
Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN
On Aug 28, 9:56 am, Michael_S wrote:
> the Luxy is
the Luxy is made to ride in the drops from what I've read.
I have never been a fan of Salsa bars... I hate the double grooves and
that anatomic bend is not comfortable.
~Mike~
On Aug 28, 7:38 am, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
> The Salsa Bell Lap can be ridden in all positions -- I like it for
> that re
The Salsa Bell Lap can be ridden in all positions -- I like it for
that reason and my only gripe is the anatomic hooks.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:30 AM, cyclotourist wrote:
> That's the problem w/ wide dirt drops (lower case). They seem to be made to
> only be used in the drops. At least the Mi
That's the problem w/ wide dirt drops (lower case). They seem to be made to
only be used in the drops. At least the Midge/Garys are like that, not sure
about the WCs.
And Philip, that Winter Cycles stem is beautifully mdade. Definitely not a
kludge IMHO.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:11 AM, EricP
Well, one could use the Woodchipper bars in 25.4 with a DritDrop
stem.
The Luxy bars look like the Woodchipper with a tighter bend. Possibly
a good idea, although I do find myself on the lower part of the
Woodchipper on some climbs on the Salsa Fargo. The whole does seem to
work well together.
Kludge! I used the same word to describe my Delta extender and short
stem combo for my Midge bars. Without good stem choices, any dirt drop
bar setup is going to be kludgey.
http://www.biketinker.com/2010/projects/stems-for-dirt-drop-bars/
I have long thought that Rivendell could offer a Nitto st
Kludgy.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Michael_S wrote:
> my understanding is 31.8 only. Which does not leave any quill stem
> options. we will have to use one of those adapters with a threadless
> stem.
>
> ~Mike~
>
> On Aug 27, 9:14 pm, cyclotourist wrote:
> > Are they going to be 25.4 or
my understanding is 31.8 only. Which does not leave any quill stem
options. we will have to use one of those adapters with a threadless
stem.
~Mike~
On Aug 27, 9:14 pm, cyclotourist wrote:
> Are they going to be 25.4 or 31.8 only? I think a bar like that is missing
> from Rivendell's offering
Are they going to be 25.4 or 31.8 only? I think a bar like that is missing
from Rivendell's offerings.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Michael_S wrote:
> yea baby! and yes it works with bar end shifters. and it's Silver!
> here is a linky to a proto of the bar
> http://singularcycles.posterous.
yea baby! and yes it works with bar end shifters. and it's Silver!
here is a linky to a proto of the bar
http://singularcycles.posterous.com/ragley-luxy-bar-latest
it would look great on the Hunqua too.
~Mike~
On Aug 27, 6:43 pm, velomann wrote:
> A midge-like bar in silver? Sweet! Now if it
A midge-like bar in silver? Sweet! Now if it accepts bar-ends (and why
wouldn't it?) I can stop my futile searching for a vintage dirt drop
bar.
On Aug 26, 7:32 am, Michael_S wrote:
> I'm waiting for that new one from Ragley called the Luxy. It was
> designed by the Midge designer after getting
I'm waiting for that new one from Ragley called the Luxy. It was
designed by the Midge designer after getting all the input on the
midge/junebug/wtb/woodchipper and it comes in silver.
goin' on the new dropbar 29er.
~Mike~
On Aug 26, 6:49 am, cyclotourist wrote:
> FWIW, Origin 8 has one they ca
25 matches
Mail list logo
