Re: [RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-17 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 06:43 -0700, Patrick in VT wrote: > On May 16, 7:10 pm, reynoldslugs wrote: > > Several of my B-17's are showing significant wear, turning into > > hatchets. What does the list recommend for replacements, something > > substantially similar that doesn't wear out so fast for

[RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-17 Thread Patrick in VT
On May 16, 7:10 pm, reynoldslugs wrote: > Several of my B-17's are showing significant wear, turning into > hatchets. What does the list recommend for replacements, something > substantially similar that doesn't wear out so fast for us Clydes? just an FYI - Bilenky Cycle Works is now the officia

[RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread rob markwardt
Like others have said...get an old one. I bought an old NOS B-17 (mid 70's) a couple years back and it is noticably stiffer than the newer versions. Rock hard but still has that shape of the b-17 that adapts to the arse instantly...if you are one of those peoples whose arse is adaptable to the b-

[RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread charlie
Buy a VO saddle they have stiffer leather with a reinforcement mesh underneath them. That's what I did and I weigh 265 and own several Brooks saddles with over 15K miles on them. On May 16, 4:10 pm, reynoldslugs wrote: > Several of my B-17's are showing significant wear, turning into > hatchets.

[RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread Mike
I'd say try a Brooks Pro. I have a Brooks Pro Classic (budget model) and the leather is much stiffer than on a B17 yet it's still a comfortable saddle. Check this link for more info: http://www.renehersestore.com/servlet/the-190/Brooks-Proffesional-Classic-Mens/Detail --mike -- You received th

[RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread terryg
Your description of your old Pro reminds me a bit of my new Berthoud. The leather is indeed thick and stiff, and it seems like it'll take years and miles to break it in nicely. It is however not as wide as the B-17 as well. On May 16, 6:43 pm, Tim McNamara wrote: > On May 16, 2010, at 6:10 PM, r

Re: [RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread Bruce
03 PM Subject: [RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out Don't An-atomicas have the cut-out in them? That makes me think it would wear out faster with a heavier rider. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To

Re: [RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread Ken Freeman
They have a version for heavier riders, called "clydesdale." On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Johnny Alien wrote: > Don't An-atomicas have the cut-out in them? That makes me think it > would wear out faster with a heavier rider. > > On May 16, 7:10 pm, reynoldslugs wrote: > > Several of my B-17

[RBW] Re: Brooks B-17's wearing out

2010-05-16 Thread Johnny Alien
Don't An-atomicas have the cut-out in them? That makes me think it would wear out faster with a heavier rider. On May 16, 7:10 pm, reynoldslugs wrote: > Several of my B-17's are showing significant wear, turning into > hatchets.  What does the list recommend for replacements, something > substan