On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> Thanks to you and Sam -- I had wondered if the run-time system wasn't
> partly driving this, and certainly chaperones on immutable data don't
> make as much sense.
They do make sense, and turn out to be important for things like
imm
Thanks to you and Sam -- I had wondered if the run-time system wasn't
partly driving this, and certainly chaperones on immutable data don't
make as much sense. But I don't see them on mutable lists either
_
For list-related administrative tasks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> I'm missing why there are impersonators and chaperones for various
> datatypes but not for lists. There's surely a good reason why, but I
> am having trouble reconstructing what it might be. Anyone?
First, chaperones aren't necess
At Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:10:27 +0200,
Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
> I'm missing why there are impersonators and chaperones for various
> datatypes but not for lists. There's surely a good reason why, but I
> am having trouble reconstructing what it might be. Anyone?
I believe it's because lists a
I'm missing why there are impersonators and chaperones for various
datatypes but not for lists. There's surely a good reason why, but I
am having trouble reconstructing what it might be. Anyone?
Shriram
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
5 matches
Mail list logo
