On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu> wrote: > Thanks to you and Sam -- I had wondered if the run-time system wasn't > partly driving this, and certainly chaperones on immutable data don't > make as much sense.
They do make sense, and turn out to be important for things like immutable but opaque structures. > But I don't see them on mutable lists either.... This is just a missing feature, which I hope we'll correct at some point soon. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
