At Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:10:27 +0200, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > I'm missing why there are impersonators and chaperones for various > datatypes but not for lists. There's surely a good reason why, but I > am having trouble reconstructing what it might be. Anyone?
I believe it's because lists are immutable, and chaperones have mostly been used for contracts on mutable data. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
