It has to be 16x16, not 24x24, sadly.
I wouldn't mind if you committed something that was just the checkmark
and the right size in collects/icons/syncheck.png.
Robby
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 09:11 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>>
>> Robby Findler wrote at
I've pushed a fix for this. If you use the automatic parenthesis
feature, please let me know if I broke something in the way you use it
(I've added tests that capture how I think it is used, but I might
have missed something or gotten something wrong.)
Thanks,
Robby
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:06 A
Robby Findler wrote at 11/14/2011 10:34 PM:
How about this one?
http://www.iconfinder.com/icondetails/3207/16/
I think it's an improvement over the magnifying glass, but you might
want something other than *only* a green checkmark in the icon. In GUIs
in general, I think a green checkmar
How about this one?
http://www.iconfinder.com/icondetails/3207/16/
Robby
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>
>> Also, does anyone know if the license:
>>
>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
>>
>>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Also, does anyone know if the license:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
>
> conflict with how we distribute Racket currently?
CC-BY-SA is incompatible with the LGPL, although I don't think that's
a problem in this case, s
I think that's a good start, but when I put it into the DrRacket bar,
the green checkmark seems too hard to make out (you can try this by
replacing the file collects/icons/syncheck.png with the 16x16 version
of that icon (or any other, of course)).
Also, does anyone know if the license:
http://
On 2011-11-14 15:56:00 -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> I think that *the* lowest-hanging fruit for DrRacket UI
> approachability for everyone would be to tweak some of the toolbar
> icons, probably by using off-the-shelf Free Software icons.[*]
>
> The first two icons I'd change are Stop (make more m
On Nov 14, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Robby Findler wrote at 11/14/2011 05:45 PM:
>> I've looked through iconfinder.com on more than one occasion for a
>> reasonable check syntax icon, but not found one. Any specific
>> suggestions?
>>
>
> If no one can find a suitable icon off-
Robby Findler wrote at 11/14/2011 05:45 PM:
I've looked through iconfinder.com on more than one occasion for a
reasonable check syntax icon, but not found one. Any specific
suggestions?
If no one can find a suitable icon off-the-shelf, and can't think of a
good analogue to use, then maybe
I've looked through iconfinder.com on more than one occasion for a
reasonable check syntax icon, but not found one. Any specific
suggestions?
Robby
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Jukka Tuominen wrote at 11/14/2011 03:09 PM:
>>
>> - More professional help is needed for re
One other suggestion/request for the automatic parens feature: Can it
be set up so that it skips over the closing paren if the user types
')' while the cursor is right in front of the automatically-inserted
')' ?
I don't know about paredit but Eclipse does this with parens and
various types of bra
Jukka Tuominen wrote at 11/14/2011 03:09 PM:
- More professional help is needed for refined look and feel on layout details,
illustrations, and icon design (metaphors and looks).
I think that *the* lowest-hanging fruit for DrRacket UI approachability
for everyone would be to tweak some of
Hi all,
I wish I had more time for this thread topic at the moment since it's extremely
interesting to me because usability and visual GUI design is my daily work and
passion, but also because I'd also like to improve the Racket IDE and hopefully
even see a GUI builder integrated into it event
Yes, I believe the bug is in that interaction. Sorry I've not had a
chance to look into it yet.
Robby
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> This may be a bad interaction between the automatic parens and the
> automatic paren adjustment, which puts in the right kind of par
The example can be simpler; typing a square bracket in a blank definitions
window makes a single paren. The hotkey still makes a pair, though.
I wish I knew about this automatic paren stuff. I have been wearing out my
esc-key.
rac
On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> This
This may be a bad interaction between the automatic parens and the
automatic paren adjustment, which puts in the right kind of paren in
the right place.
Robby, do you know what's going on here?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Here is what I did:
>
> - activate the automatic
Here is what I did:
- activate the automatic parentheses option
then:
type `('
--> ()
type `let ('
--> (let ())
type `['
--> (let ([))
Here I would have expected
--> (let ([]))
?
-- Éric
On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> They have successfully inserted thousands
Right. A Racket Declaration of Independence. (-:
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> This is a pretty poor example to illustrate your point, because Racket
> still does not have static type checking.
my bad word choice or understanding of Typed Racket aside, the point
is that some people think static typing is "emin
> having said that, "eminently sensible" is in the eye of the beholder.
> after all, racket didn't have static type checking for most of its
> life, no? i am not saying it is or is not eminent in my own view, i am
> pointing out that it is pretty subjective so you can't actually call
> it "eminentl
They have successfully inserted thousands of square brackets for me.
:) What are you doing that doesn't work?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Eric Tanter wrote:
> Nice!
>
> but automatic parentheses does not seem to work with square brackets.
>
> -- Éric
>
>
> On Nov 13, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Robb
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
>> i do it in emacs usually if we are talking about being able to
>> evaluate chunks.
>
> In short, you're expecting that DrRacket's functionality is going to
> include a traditional IDE AND Emacs? Is that a reasonable demand?
what i
> i do it in emacs usually if we are talking about being able to
> evaluate chunks.
But Emacs is not an IDE. You began by complaining that DrRacket is
not more like other traditional IDEs, and making platform-specific
complaints. Is there ANY sense in which Emacs is more
platform-specific than D
, 13 de noviembre de 2011 20:06
To: Racket Users
Subject: Re: [racket] DrRacket needs work
sincere thanks for everybody's bluntness.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> We, and in particular Robby, have put a lot of effort into making
> DrRacket a useful
Nice!
but automatic parentheses does not seem to work with square brackets.
-- Éric
On Nov 13, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions. One minor observation below.
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Tomi Neste wrote:
>> - Paredit like editing functions, I can'
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> When you do this in Eclipse, what exact steps do you follow? And what
> does Eclipse do in response? Can you show an example?
i do it in emacs usually if we are talking about being able to
evaluate chunks. when using clojure or sc
On Nov 13, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> apparently i can't higlight a sub-section of code and "run" just that.
When you do this in Eclipse, what exact steps do you follow? And what
does Eclipse do in response? Can you show an example?
Thanks,
Shriram
On Nov 13, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
> apparently i can't higlight a sub-section of code and "run" just that.
In a typical Racket program, you define a bunch of new functions or macros,
then use those to define other functions or macros, then use those to define
other functions or ma
On Nov 13, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
> sincere thanks for everybody's bluntness.
Speaking of which. I think the main message for you is
to reduce the noise-to-signal ratio in your messages. It
is our goal to help 'customers' and 'clients' and when
messages with real content come in,
sincere thanks for everybody's bluntness.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> We, and in particular Robby, have put a lot of effort into making
> DrRacket a useful programming environment. If you have specific ways
> of making it better, or even specific things that you
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
> There is an example in the documentation exactly for that:
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/drracket/Keyboard_Shortcuts.html#(part._.Sending_.Program_.Fragments_to_the_.R.E.P.L)
Thanks! That is exactly the kind of information I was looking f
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 08:50, Tomi Neste wrote:
>
>
> - Send expression to the REPL functionality. I know that this kind of
> functionality is limited for a reason but since the REPL is still
> there it would be nice if it could be interacted with more
> comfortably.
>
>
There is an examp
It works. Thank you very much.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Chris wrote:
> +1 on this. I know other REPLs (at least python) do the same, but I think
> behaving like a command line would be more natural to most people.
> Ctrl+Enter to evaluate, Enter to line break would be nice too.
>
>
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:11:15 -0500
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> We, and in particular Robby, have put a lot of effort into making
> DrRacket a useful programming environment. If you have specific ways
> of making it better, or even specific things that you found
> off-putting or difficult, that
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>> Yes: control-return or alt-return, depending on your platform.
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about this option and was very much missing it.
> Works very nicely (ctrl-enter
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> Yes: control-return or alt-return, depending on your platform.
Thanks, I didn't know about this option and was very much missing it.
Works very nicely (ctrl-enter in GNU/Linix).
I very much like DrRacket and use it for all my Racket progra
Thanks for the suggestions. One minor observation below.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Tomi Neste wrote:
> - Paredit like editing functions, I can't personally use an editor
> without these anymore. Again, this is something that could be hacked
> up easily in Emacs but with DrRacket I have no
Um, it does that already.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Chris wrote:
> +1 on this. I know other REPLs (at least python) do the same, but I think
> behaving like a command line would be more natural to most people. Ctrl+Enter
> to evaluate, Enter to line break would be nice too.
>
> On 2011-1
+1 on this. I know other REPLs (at least python) do the same, but I think
behaving like a command line would be more natural to most people. Ctrl+Enter
to evaluate, Enter to line break would be nice too.
On 2011-11-13, at 9:46, "nicolas.o...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I like Dr Racket very much, bu
Yes: control-return or alt-return, depending on your platform.
Robby
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:46 AM, nicolas.o...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I like Dr Racket very much, but I have a small problem that might be easy
> to solve:
> When hitting return in the middle of a line, in the REPL, in does not
> e
What is exactly the target group of DrRacket?
If it's meant to be an easy to use basic IDE for learning the
language(s) I think it does a fairly good job and from what I have
seen in various internet forums it's usually highly recommended as
such when the topic of learning Scheme comes up. But as
I like Dr Racket very much, but I have a small problem that might be easy
to solve:
When hitting return in the middle of a line, in the REPL, in does not
evaluate the line but adds a line break.
I think this might be the right behaviour but I would like to have a way to
send the s-expr to evaluat
My work with racket usually comprises a 50/50 split between Emacs and DrRacket.
When working in DrRacket there are a few things I miss:
1) Autocomplete anything. DrRacket expands built-in definitions, never my own,
even within the current file. While some fancy IDE's use context sensitive
I'm not sure if this is really a matter of either/or - from a usability
standpoint, I find DrRacket excellent, but it does seem a bit old-fashioned in
some ways. I frankly find it a bit difficult to say just how. I know it doesn't
look like Eclipse (and, yes, it wasn't hard to guess that the per
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
>
> so i might be totally the wrong audience because i can't stomach
> trying to get to the stuff that is under the skin-deep-ugly to the
> deeper way cool powerful technology.
We, and in particular Robby, have put a lot of effort into making
Dr
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
> New IDEs always feel weird. Try out EiffelStudio and it seems so weird
> but after a few days it feels right at home. DrRacket is the same.
for sure there are lots of ways to look at this issue. what is the
real target audience? what can we e
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>>> That's a topic for a different discussion thread, but... I'm guessing some
>>> factors that would affect this comparative asses
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Raoul Duke wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>> That's a topic for a different discussion thread, but... I'm guessing some
>> factors that would affect this comparative assessment:
>>
>> (1) How much experience and skill one has with
48 matches
Mail list logo
