> My impression is that `raco exe` predates the rise of "scripting
> languages" like Python and Ruby, in which it's common to tell users,
> "Make sure you have version X of Python or Ruby, then install my app".
I would say that "raco exe" is rather useless, and I don't see the point
really. It st
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:12:44 -0600
Robby Findler
wrote:
> Oh, apparently the difference you're seeing is indeed racket/match. I
> see that the contract system is already pulled in with those requires
> -- it is bigger than racket/match. (You can see what libraries are
> indirectly loaded by using
Oh, apparently the difference you're seeing is indeed racket/match. I see
that the contract system is already pulled in with those requires -- it is
bigger than racket/match. (You can see what libraries are indirectly loaded
by using DrRacket's View|Show Module Browser.)
Anyway, in the current git
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:55:16 -0600
Robby Findler
wrote:
> Looks like most of the size increase from racket/date is that you're
> pulling in the contract system.
No quite sure about this.
I have
#lang racket/base
(require racket/cmdline
racket/string
racket/format
Looks like most of the size increase from racket/date is that you're
pulling in the contract system. Still, there was some dead code in that
file whose removal let me remove a few requires from it (eliminating a
dependency on racket/match, since none of the things racket/date requires
require it).
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 06:07:17 -0700
Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 12 Feb 2014 06:02:30 +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> > I just read Neil van Dyke's statement:
> >
> > < "#lang racket" is for demos, IMHO; I *always* use "#lang
> > racket/base" < for any code that's not a demo.
> >
> > Question: Wh
Although I could be mistaken about any/all of the following, I'll go
out on a limb -- and once there, jump up and down.
> < "#lang racket" is for demos, IMHO; I *always* use "#lang racket/base"
> < for any code that's not a demo.
>
> Question: What are the advantages of doing requires explicitly?
At Wed, 12 Feb 2014 06:02:30 +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> I just read Neil van Dyke's statement:
>
> < "#lang racket" is for demos, IMHO; I *always* use "#lang racket/base"
> < for any code that's not a demo.
>
> Question: What are the advantages of doing requires explicitly?
>
> In a program o
I just read Neil van Dyke's statement:
< "#lang racket" is for demos, IMHO; I *always* use "#lang racket/base"
< for any code that's not a demo.
Question: What are the advantages of doing requires explicitly?
In a program of mine I changed #lang racket to #lang racket/base and
added:
(require
9 matches
Mail list logo
