Oh, apparently the difference you're seeing is indeed racket/match. I see that the contract system is already pulled in with those requires -- it is bigger than racket/match. (You can see what libraries are indirectly loaded by using DrRacket's View|Show Module Browser.)
Anyway, in the current git version (with the change to racket/date I mentioned yesterday), I get 2.2M for the version without racket/date and 2.3 for the version with. But in 5.94, I see 3.9M for the version with racket/date. Robby On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Manfred Lotz <manfred.l...@arcor.de> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:55:16 -0600 > Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: > > > Looks like most of the size increase from racket/date is that you're > > pulling in the contract system. > > No quite sure about this. > > I have > > #lang racket/base > > (require racket/cmdline > racket/string > racket/format > racket/port > racket/path > racket/list) > > which gives a size of 2123435 for the executable. > > I add one line > (require racket/date) > and the executable has size 4029647 > > Is there something implicit happening with the contract system? > > > -- > Manfred > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
