I just read Neil van Dyke's statement: < "#lang racket" is for demos, IMHO; I *always* use "#lang racket/base" < for any code that's not a demo.
Question: What are the advantages of doing requires explicitly? In a program of mine I changed #lang racket to #lang racket/base and added: (require racket/cmdline) (require racket/string) (require racket/format) (require racket/port) (require racket/path) (require racket/list) The resulting executable (created by raco exe...) had the same size. Besides of transparency what are the advantages? -- Manfred ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
