We're using the free-for-open-source plan from Discourse:
https://free.discourse.group/
Sam
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 1:13 PM Ryan Johnson wrote:
> Thanks
>
> How did you guys get a discourse.group subdomain? I visited
> discourse.group and the domain is unreachable.
>
&
I don't think that you need to remove `t`. Instead, your problem is
that somewhere something is calling `collection-path` with "t" as an
argument. If you provide more information about the context and the
error message, it would be easier to help here.
Sam
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022
ll: I normally wait for a go-ahead from a quorum before applying
> changes like this. If I don't need to wait, then please tell me.
I think if you're good with this approach, you should move forward with it.
Sam
> Sam: You mentioned someone got a 404 from an invite link. 404s sometime
easy to have someone else step up. The alternative where we specify a
specific email requires potentially changing that email address when
the responsibility changes.
Does that seem like a reasonable approach?
Sam
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:30 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
> No no, that was helpful
y clear who gets the emails when people ask, but
this seems like it might be a good intermediate position.
Sam
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:32 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
> Alright, thanks to all of you for the quick replies. As of this writing, the
> list has been reconfigured to create an e
It appears that enabling this is quite simple. I believe I have set it
up so that emailing racket+uncategorize...@discoursemail.com should
create a new topic in the Uncategorized category. Feel free to test it
out.
Sam
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 8:27 AM Stephen De Gabrielle
wrote:
>
>
that?
Thanks again,
Sam
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 7:19 PM James Platt wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I've got some pretty good general sysadmin skills. I would have to get up
> to speed with some of the specific technologies but that should not be a
> problem. I'm pretty much booked
you're willing to volunteer some time to help with this, let me
know, either here or by messaging me (@samth) on Discord or Slack.
Sam
### Notes:
The implementation of pkgs.racket-lang.org is a front-end here:
https://github.com/racket/racket-pkg-website and a backend here:
https://github.
The --binary flag only works for the current release with the default
catalog iirc.
Cheers,
Sam
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 11:58 Sorawee Porncharoenwase
wrote:
> I think it's so that `raco pkg install mypkg-lib` won't install
> `racket-doc` if you use Minimal Racket?
>
> If
October 2, 2021
1 PM PDT
4 PM EDT
8 PM UTC
10 PM CEST
Should be the same URL as previous meetups.
https://gather.town/app/wH1EDG3McffLjrs0/racket-users
Cheers,
Sam
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:49 AM Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> Is there going to be a Racket online meeting at the gather site to
might
expose.
Feedback on this advisory, and any security issues discovered in
Racket, is welcome at secur...@racket-lang.org
[1] the `#:requires` argument to `make-evaluator`, or the `requires`
arguments to `make-evaluator/submission` and similar.
Sam, for the Racket team
--
You received this
Ah, this must be a case where different platforms behave differently,
because I still see other threads running even with
`finder:std-get-file` on Linux.
Sam
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:58 PM David Storrs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:42 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
&
's supposed
to happen on other platforms either.
Sam
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:36 PM David Storrs wrote:
>
> What is the best way to pass a function into a child `place`?
>
> I've got a server function that accepts a dispatch function as one of its
> arguments and I need to be
Racket.
The main download site, download.racket-lang.org, still works as
normal, and linking to that site will continue to work.
Sam
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:11 AM wrote:
>
>
> Northeastern has taken down its research machines and network for major
> repairs.
> The outage will
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:04 PM Jonathan Simpson wrote:
>
> On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 10:25:36 PM UTC-4 Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:46 PM Jonathan Simpson wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sunday, June 27, 2021 at 10:29:55 AM UTC-4 Robby
first kind of contract check can be removed in
the simplest of cases; the second kind is basically never removed by
the compiler. There are other cases where macros can generate code
that omits contract checks, as with the `for` forms when used with
sequence generators like `in-list`, but that is again
This is indeed an issue where "the top-level is hopeless" is the problem [1].
However, there's a better work-around. You can write `(define-syntaxes
(name.r ...) (values))` to forward-declare all those names, and then
the subsequent definitions will work correctly.
Sam
[1] https
at we should have, and we
are sorry.
If you wish to offer your thoughts to the people named below, the
email address feedb...@racket-lang.org will reach us directly.
Jay McCarthy
John Clements
Matthew Flatt
Robby Findler
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
[Matthew Butterick's recent po
in which case you'd
get worse error messages but probably nothing else wrong.
Sam
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:42 PM David Storrs wrote:
>
> Thank you. Is there a way to do it without the mutation? I was hoping to
> use this for macro generation that simplifies combining with-hand
It's not quite as convenient, but here's a version of your program
that should work:
(let ([conn #f])
(dynamic-wind
(lambda () (set! conn (connect-to-server))
(lambda () (send-message conn "foo"))
(lambda () (finalize-connection conn
Sam
On Tue, May 18, 2
You might also be interested in the new `raco-pkg-env` tool:
https://github.com/samdphillips/raco-pkg-env/
Sam
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:20 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Yes, this approach can work. I don't think the existing Racket tools
> will help much with persisting a config
lopment
branch. It's true that it hasn't been updated recently, but that's the
idea.
Sam
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 4:08 PM unlimitedscolobb
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to chime back in and say that renaming manual.rkt to
> typed-compose.rkt didn't seem to affect
Ah, I meant what happens when I open up my scribble file in DrRacket and
press the "Scribble HTML" button. Maybe it would be more accurate to
describe that as a plugin than DrRacket itself?
-Sam Caldwell
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:24 AM Robby Findler
wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at
ion I need to do something like the
Typed Racket example.
-Sam Caldwell
[1]
https://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/running.html?q=scribble#%28part._xref-flags%29
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 2:00 PM Ryan Kramer wrote:
> Using the prefix should still link correctly. When I run the following
> p
docs were written)?
It also looks like this pattern could be captured by a macro---has someone
written that already?
Thanks,
Sam Caldwell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei
This is a bug. It's not the the contract is unsatisfiable, it's that it's
too satisfiable. The contract system could probably make this work, but
Typed Racket should probably avoid this situation.
Sam
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021, 2:07 AM 'John Clements' via Racket Users <
r
when `(Object? product-obj?)` is #f).
> Honestly, when I went through the code for binary fx... operations I
> realized that making them variadic is possible but not straightforward
> at all. Without digging deeper it seems to me that it is actually a lot
> of work. I will look in
It's a little more complicated than that -- the _constraints_ have to
be linear -- that is, the expressions in the refinements, but the
expressions reasoned about can be more general. However, it doesn't do
very much useful with multiplication by bounded values at the moment.
Sam
On M
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 3:05 AM Dominik Pantůček
wrote:
>
> 0. Thank you very much for looking into this.
>
> On 18. 04. 21 4:57, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > Ok, three parts:
> >
> > 1. Is it possible to make `average` on `Byte` provably produce a
> > `Byt
we should go. For example, it can already prove that rd in
the rgb-distance^2 function has this type: (define-type PMByte (Refine
[v : Fixnum] (and (< v 256) (< -256 v
3. I don't see any boundaries where you describe -- can you say more?
Sam
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:06 PM Dominik
To improve this, we'd have to extend the type of `fxquotient`, which
is reasonable, but I'm not sure what the addition would be. In
particular, your addition is not sound:
(fxquotient 1024 2) produces 512 which is not a Byte.
Sam
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 6:22 PM Dominik Pantů
, I can probably have a look into that and send PR
> if I am successful.
A PR extending the types for those functions would be very welcome.
Let me know if you need any help.
Sam
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To uns
There is indeed signing for Ubuntu ppas, but that's specific both to apt
and to the ppa system.
Sam
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, 9:29 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
> No, I'm just looking for extra confidence when verifying installers.
>
> On that note, did Ubuntu require someone to sign pac
You might use `(list 'value-evt)` if that's the require you want.
Sam
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:41 PM David Storrs wrote:
>
> I cargo-culted this chunk of code and, predictably, it is now failing
> for reasons I don't understand. This is in the value-evt scribble
>
I don't think we have plans to start signing installers. The code that
creates installers is in the `distro-build` package, and the use of
sha1 is here:
https://github.com/racket/distro-build/blob/21ccc39fc14408eea79aff035e508856a66adf89/distro-build-server/pack-built.rkt#L76
Sam
On Thu,
This should be fixed now.
Let this be a lesson about ignoring warnings about out-of-date software. :)
Sam
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:59 AM David Storrs wrote:
>
> Not sure where the right place is to report this, but the certificate for
> pkgd.racket-lang.org expired on
take an average. The `hyperfine` tool is
good for that. But probably the best advice is to make the program
take longer so differences are more apparent -- variation usually
increases sub-linearly.
Sam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:17 PM Laurent wrote:
>
> Sam: How do you accurately measure such
Another possibility is to send a message on a channel when the user is
set, and then just wait with `sync` for a message to appear on the
channel.
Sam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:02 PM Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> The best thing is to use a semaphore instead of a mutable reference.
> If you
Use `#:authentic`, and `unsafe-vector*-{ref,set!}` saved about 50 more
ms on my machine.
Then getting rid of `set!` and just re-binding the relevant variables
produced another 50 ms speedup.
https://gist.github.com/7fc52e7bdc327fb59c8858a42258c26a
Sam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:21 AM Sam Tobin
One minor additional suggestion: if you use #:authentic for the struct, it
will generate slightly better code for the accessors.
Sam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021, 6:18 AM Bogdan Popa wrote:
> I updated the gist with some cleanups and additional improvements that
> get the runtime down to a littl
And using a big buffer and doing my own newline splitting
didn't help either.
The version using just a regexp matching on a port (suggested by
Robby) turned out not to be faster either, so my suspicion is that the
original slowness is just using regexps for splitting words.
Sam
On Thu, Mar 18,
laptop.
I think the remaining difference between Racket and other languages is
likely the `string-split` and `string-downcase` functions, plus the
relatively-inefficient string representation that Racket uses.
Sam
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:28 AM Pawel Mosakowski wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
think you originally requested:
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/fluet/research/tx-events/
Sam
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021, 9:48 PM Greg Rosenblatt wrote:
> Thanks for the help, everyone.
>
> Sam, it looks like you've worked with Aaron a bit on reagents in
> https://github.com/aturon/Cape
I think Aaron Turon's reagents (and more generally k-cas) are an example of
N-way rendezvous.
Sam
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 5:50 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 15 Mar 2021 13:38:46 -0700 (PDT), Greg Rosenblatt wrote:
> > Is there a corresponding event for a logical conjunction
I believe it's
https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/0561d71e60502fa857b0d169f64da723584d96d6
Sam
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:52 PM Greg Rosenblatt wrote:
>
> Great, thanks. Out of curiosity, where in the reader was this bug
> originally? Can you point me to a diff?
>
>
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:24 PM Dimaugh Silvestris
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 19:29, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't print that way because that wouldn't turn back into the original
>> value when evaluated, since it's quoted.
>
>
I think you want to add `#:property prop:custom-print-quotable 'never`
to that struct declaration, and then it will behave as you wanted.
Sam
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:44 AM Dimaugh Silvestris
wrote:
>
> I have a struct defined as:
> (struct ugen sc.unit (name rate inputs)
ing the failure cases.
Sam
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:23 AM philngu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the tip about PLT_CS_COMPILE_LIMIT! I submitted a revision to the
> syntax object variant that incorporated sleepnova's and yjqww6's improvements.
>
> Also, I never knew
` the timing became much slower.
Sam
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:39 AM philngu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> There’s this benchmark on BF interpreter where the Racket and Chez Scheme
> implementations are very similar, but Chez Scheme is much faster than Racket
> 8.0 at interpreting bench
When Chez is faster than Racket CS, the usual culprits are either:
- mutable pairs
- very large code size that causes Racket CS to interpret the outer module
However, neither of those seem to be happening here.
Sam
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:39 AM philngu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> There’
You can use the value-contract function, along with contract-stronger? to
do this.
Sam
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021, 6:03 PM David Storrs wrote:
> I have some macros that generate functions. For testing purposes, I'd
> like to be able to ask the function "Do you have this contract
Github doesn't require making your email address public.
Sam
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:19 PM Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:47:19PM +0700, Roger Keays wrote:
> > Has any consideration been given to concealing email addresses on
> > pkgs.racket-lang.o
Unfortunately, it's old versions of Racket that don't support this,
and adding error messages there will have the same problem as fixing
them -- they're already out there and on people's computers. However,
this will be fixed in the next release of Racket.
Sam
On Tue, Feb
This seems like it would be a nice addition. I think starting with a
PR is the right place to begin.
Sam
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 7:01 PM 'William J. Bowman' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
> One of my students asked about making the Racket docs navbar sticky and
> scrollable, to h
I think there's a typo in your program -- there's an extra "br" in the
name of `racket/function`.
Sam
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:58 AM Gowthaman Basuvaraj
wrote:
>
> open-input-file: cannot open module file
> module path: racket/functionbr
> path: /home/
w enough...
>
> Greetings.
>
> Killian Zhuo (KDr2, https://kdr2.com)
>
>
>
> On Saturday, February 6, 2021, 07:47:41 AM GMT+8, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <
> sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>
>
> This means that you're building with a previous version of Racket t
This means that you're building with a previous version of Racket that is
too old (which might be quite recent but is nonetheless too old to use in
place of bootstrapping).
Sam
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021, 6:44 PM 'Killian Zhuo (KDr2)' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com&
Unfortunately this isn't supported yet. Right now, you can use struct
type properties directly to build your own generics, but you can't use
the generics library.
Sam
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 4:20 AM Stuart Hungerford
wrote:
>
> Hi Racketeers,
>
> Is there any way to
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:16 PM Dominik Pantůček
wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I went through all my notes and prepared minimal (sometimes) working
> examples for most of the issues I mentioned. Let's go through it one by
> one. I assume that some of the complications I encoun
tation from argument names
> in the syntax pattern when it defines new procedures - I did some ugly
> hacks to get through it but in the end I just refrained from using them
> when possible (except for the unsafe-struct macro, of course).
> commits, 2292-line diff!) and genuinely (it real
XIS
>KING & MATTHIAS FELLEISEN
>
>
> https://2020.splashcon.org/details/splash-2020-oopsla/105/Macros-for-Domain-Specific-Languages
>
Kind regards,
Sam Phillips & Stephen De Gabrielle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rack
I believe this is a bug in `web-server/insta`, but here's a workaround:
Add the following to the beginning of the `app` module:
(require racket/runtime-path)
(define-runtime-path here ".")
Then use `here` instead of `(current-directory)` in the `start` function.
Sam
On Tue, De
Hi Nicolas,
I do want to encourage you to keep thinking about this stuff -- some
of the things I described are definitely doable and would be
interesting projects, even if re-writing the entire expander is a big
task.
Sam
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:46 PM nicobao wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
&g
Here's an example:
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse))
(define-syntax (foo stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ arg:id)
#:when (regexp-match "[$]" (symbol->string (syntax-e #'arg)))
#'1]
[(_ arg) #'2]))
(foo $abc)
(foo abc)
That pri
ches between the languages that would be tricky to
overcome. Another possibility would be to directly produce JavaScript
from that layer. You might be interested in the RacketScript project:
https://github.com/vishesh/racketscript
If you're interested in thinking more about these topics, or working
d (hash))
```
This program type checks with your second `require/typed` of
`hash-ref`, but it's wrong. We can see that by using
`unsafe-require/typed`, and we get an error because we can't apply
"x".
Furthermore, you can't generalize to (U T (-> T) either, because if T
is
l` is about 12ms.
Sam
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:04 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>
> th-place is used if places are not enabled when Racket is built (this is the
> default on some platforms).
>
> I'm making progress on shrinking this, hopefully I'll have a patch done soon.
th-place is used if places are not enabled when Racket is built (this is
the default on some platforms).
I'm making progress on shrinking this, hopefully I'll have a patch done
soon.
One thing to note is that '#%place can be required directly and will have
almost no start-up cost
Unfortunately, that doesn't work -- the values in the hash could
include functions.
Sam
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:25 AM Tim Jervis wrote:
>
> For the type of the third argument, rather than "any non-function", could
> Typed Racket use the type of the values in the
Almost certainly the problem is expansion time. If I run that program
on my machine, it takes about 200 ms. But if I compile the file to zo
first with `raco make`, then it takes about 40 ms, basically identical
to `racket/base`.
Sam
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 9:39 AM Nate Griswold wrote:
>
>
If you found it useful, it's probably reasonable to add it to the
library for everyone.
Sam
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:46 PM Dominik Pantůček
wrote:
>
> Hello Racketeers,
>
> we were working on a module today that uses the net/ftp module for batch
> communication with som
Can you post the output of `raco pkg show -l --rx scribble`?
Sam
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:10 PM Christopher Lemmer Webber
wrote:
>
> I've done the following to my git repo of scribble:
>
> raco pkg update --scope user --clone scribble-lib
> raco pkg update --scope user
t; if you make it a package or
collection, which is usually a good idea for anything long lived.
Sam
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
y to remove and the basic ideas apply.
I didn't include splicing begins in the post, but it's comparatively
straightforward and in the actual implementation [2].
-Sam Caldwell
[1]
http://prl.ccs.neu.edu/blog/2018/10/22/defining-local-bindings-in-turnstile-languages/
[2]
http
That page actually suggests they're inherited from Common Lisp, which
seems very likely (and probably from some other Lisp before that).
Sam
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:59 PM Sorawee Porncharoenwase
wrote:
>
> I had this question too. It looks like they are inherited from Scheme.
&
The list of explicitly-installed packages is available from `raco pkg
show`. You could use a script to parse that, or you can use
`installed-pkg-table` from `pkg/lib` to get the list in Racket.
Sam
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:03 AM primer wrote:
>
> On Sunday, October 11, 2020 at 1:35:24
djust the particular colors chosen in the Preferences dialog,
under the Check Syntax tab.
Sam
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 10:12 AM Adam El Mazouari
wrote:
>
> An example is this:
>
> (define (square-all lst) (if (null? lst)
>
> '()
> (cons (square (car lst))
>
> (squar
Can you give an example of which things you'd like to be different? We
usually use "variable" and "identifier" for very similar meanings when
discussing Racket, for example.
Sam
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:16 AM Adam El Mazouari
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
>
How will this affect the pkg-build snapshots?
Sam
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:33 PM Robby Findler wrote:
>
> I'm finally catching up and switching the Northwestern snapshots to BC by
> default. I've made the change and the changes will kick off tonight at
> midnight,
port->lines produces a list with all the lines in it. That list is what
uses all the memory. Using in-lines avoids producing the whole list at
once.
Sam
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020, 8:53 AM Hong Yang wrote:
> Thanks Laurent, I tried (in-lines...), and yes, it's memory-efficient, but
> I
We may change Racket CS so that it produces the same results, but in
general the results of `struct->vector` on values that are opaque is
not something that should be relied on.
The describe library is, I believe, unmaintained, and hasn't been
updated in many years.
Sam
On Thu, Sep 17,
This is a difference in behavior between Racket BC and Racket CS, and
not something in the describe library:
[samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master) racket-7.8] racket
Welcome to Racket v7.8.
> (struct->vector 5)
'#(struct:fixnum-integer ...)
> ^D
[samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master) plt]
Hi Stephen,
I ran this small benchmark against a remote web server, and was
definitely getting better response using the http-easy module.
https://gist.github.com/samdphillips/32763ebd0d938678c2972b1dd8ee5778
$ racket -e '(require (submod "http-perf.rkt" curl))'
cpu time: 768 real time: 35299 gc
For that, I recommend "Open require path" in the File menu in DrRacket.
Sam
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 9:09 PM Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> I'm curious why the Package Manager doesn't also show the collection name
> (or plural)? Wouldn't I need that to trace backward
.
[1] This is necessary, since you need to know the package name in general
to find the info.rkt file in the first place.
Sam
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 9:03 AM Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> This is almost certainly intended and/or I may have totally misunderstood
> the semantics of the info fil
The issue is that `struct-guard/c` is slow. If you just write a
function as a guard it's faster than `struct/contract`.
Sam
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:41 PM Christopher Lemmer Webber
wrote:
>
> I tested the following:
>
> (struct foo (bar baz)
> #:guard (struct-guard/c a
I tried a few more versions of Racket, and this broke between 6.12 and
7.0, probably due to the new expander at that time. I'm surprised that
it works on Racket CS, though.
Sam
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:36 AM Greg Rosenblatt wrote:
>
> Thanks, your output helped narrow down the
This works for me the way you describe:
```
[samth@huor:/tmp cs-snap] r -ie '(enter! "x.rkt")'
Welcome to Racket v7.8.0.7 [cs].
loading example
"x.rkt"> example
5
"x.rkt">
```
Perhaps there was a problem with 7.3 that you're running into? Ca
so be great.
A note on BC vs CS: we aim to continue providing support for Racket BC
for the foreseeable future, certainly for the next several years.
Sam
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:29 PM jcmdln wrote:
>
> Digging through some of the older Issues in
> https://github.com/racket/racket/issue
r function is
doing.
Here's a benchmark of your two functions that takes long enough to run
that it avoids some of these issues, and also runs a GC before
benchmarking: https://gist.github.com/7cb4645308d8572e2250833ef7b90b7c
On my machine, I get 40 ms for version 1, and 100 ms for version 2, a
tiple files, including main.rkt, sgl.rlt, and gl.rkt.
> Am I correct that main.rkt is what I get with (require sgl)
> and that gl.rkt is what I get with (require sgl/gl)?
>
That's correct.
Sam
-- hendrik
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 5:51 PM Hendrik Boom
&
Yes, I think that's still the best approach.
Sam
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:47 PM Nate Griswold wrote:
>
> Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when
> adding typed racket layer on top of my ffi bindings.
>
> Is this (https://github.com/racket/typ
Note that Matthew's point was not about bytecode, but about the machine
code in the Racket BC executable vs the machine code in the Chez kernel
plus boot files. Especially if you look pre-7.0, there is very little
bytecode in the Racket BC executable.
Sam
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020, 3:46 PM Gu
such an
interpreter, for example.
The best way to distinguish compilers from interpreters is that a
compiler takes a program and produces another program, whereas an
interpreter takes a program (along with some input) and produces an
answer.
Sam
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:35 PM zeRusski wrote
flatten all of a racket program into something that can be
compiled and loaded as a single file, avoiding IO (this accomplishes 2
as well)
4. ways to make the macro expander substantially faster
Sam
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 1:36 PM zeRusski wrote:
>
> Hi all. I wonder if such a thing ex
A reminder: there's one more week to take the 2020 Racket Survey.
We've had fantastic response so far, but we don't want to miss anyone.
Fill out the survey here: https://forms.gle/XeHdgv8R7o2VjBbF9
Sam
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:22 PM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
>
> We’r
o add the type in
`typed-racket/base-env/base-special-env`. `yield` can be given a type
in `typed-racket/base-env/base-env`. The tricky part will be figuring
out what those types should be.
I'm happy to answer more questions about adding this.
Sam
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:22 PM Nate Grisw
Currently, neither `racket/stream` nor `racket/generator` are
supported by Typed Racket, unfortunately.
Sam
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:15 AM Nate Griswold wrote:
>
> Actually, is there any way at all to use lazy lists of things (streams or
> generators) in typed racket?
>
> Na
` not having
a git repository as source, then you should first do `racket pkg
update --lookup --catalog https://pkgs.racket-lang.org rackunit` to
switch from the 7.7 catalog to the pkgs.racket-lang.org one.
Sam
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:03 AM zeRusski wrote:
>
> Hi all. Latest commit to ra
other. Then
force just becomes the identity function, and passes through a promise to
somewhere that isn't expecting one.
Is it possible that some library you're using features promises?
Alternatively, it might be that the embedding code needs an explicit
dependency on promises.
Sam
On Mo
1 - 100 of 1355 matches
Mail list logo
