Yes, I think that's still the best approach. Sam
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:47 PM Nate Griswold <nategrisw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello. Ran into some problems with typed racket and define-cstruct when > adding typed racket layer on top of my ffi bindings. > > Is this (https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/766) still the > recommended way of working around the issue? > > Nate > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAM-xLPoRnfw%3DEwLQjq2Qwqhc56Mx5bZ7wyeaXWD1GWeN3mwG5w%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BZf5E0XSoAMCLoccef5dtG7%3DjXEPD%2BUvLjsaLgP_M1ArQ%40mail.gmail.com.
