We may change Racket CS so that it produces the same results, but in general the results of `struct->vector` on values that are opaque is not something that should be relied on.
The describe library is, I believe, unmaintained, and hasn't been updated in many years. Sam On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:17 PM Kevin Forchione <lyss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 15, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> > > wrote: > > > > This is a difference in behavior between Racket BC and Racket CS, and > > not something in the describe library: > > > > [samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master) racket-7.8] racket > > Welcome to Racket v7.8. > >> (struct->vector 5) > > '#(struct:fixnum-integer ...) > >> ^D > > [samth@homer:~/work/teaching/c211 (master) plt] racket > > Welcome to Racket v7.8.0.9 [cs]. > >> (struct->vector 5) > > '#(struct:simple …) > > > Is this going to be the go-forward stance for Racket? Or is this still a work > in progress? Will it be left up to the code to determine types through > predicate checking? > > Thanks! > > Kevin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/F42194F9-ADA3-4158-BCBA-3A65F2108AB4%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAK%3DHD%2BaiK06QrfOc2FLjTCFzvvo-cPpbSGChQ9yAnon_tp6wVw%40mail.gmail.com.
