On 23/03/16 10:08, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Note that there is a reasonable discussion in Writing R Extensions, but as
always, you have to find it first.
Fortune nomination!
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373
ind anything about "mis-spellings" in "Writing R
Extensions".
I don't like leaving a package in a state in which the package checker
produces NOTES. Is there anything that I can do about this one? Other
than remove the offending words, which I am reluctant to do.
On 22/07/16 10:00, Ben Bolker wrote:
Previous conversation on r-devel:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2014-December/070237.html
Martin Mächler suggests that a patch to R-devel would be welcome:
I agree that some customization possibility would be great here.
Maybe it'll be sufficient
On 22/07/16 10:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 21/07/2016 5:48 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I just had a revision of a package built by win-builder, as a way of
exposing it to a rigorous check before uploading it to CRAN.
The 00check.log contained the note:
> Possibly mis-spelled words
On 22/07/16 10:37, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 22.07.2016 00:34, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 21/07/2016 5:48 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I just had a revision of a package built by win-builder, as a way of
exposing it to a rigorous check before uploading it to CRAN.
The 00check.log contained the note
s:
subroutine mnnd(x,y,n,dminbig,dminav)
implicit double precision(a-h,o-z)
.
I.e. the "actual types are "double precision",
"double precision", "integer", "double precision",
"double precision".
So in thi
On 23/04/17 09:44, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 23 April 2017 at 09:25, Rolf Turner wrote:
| However I found a posting by Ege Rubak on this topic which sent me by a
| slightly roundabout route to a posting by Dirk Eddelbuttel
There is a transcribed Umlaut in there: Eddelbuettel (ie
Thanks for trying, but your example blows me away completely.
cheers,
Rolf
On 23/04/17 14:47, Avraham Adler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
The foregoing "official" way would seem to apply to functions called by
".Call" (which I never use; it
On 23/04/17 21:57, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 22/04/2017 5:25 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
(1) I found that having an R function with the same name as that of a
routine (Fortran subroutine in this case) that it called, causes all
sorts of chaos. I had a function "binsrt" that called
On 23/04/17 23:05, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Looks like
extern void F77_NAME(mnnd)(double *, double *, int *, double *,
double *);
to me.
One more (I hope it's the last!) question:
One of my subroutines has an argument of type *logical*. There is no
logical type in C. So, since I am perforc
On 24/04/17 10:31, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 24 April 2017 at 10:18, Rolf Turner wrote:
| One more (I hope it's the last!) question:
|
| One of my subroutines has an argument of type *logical*. There is no
| logical type in C. So, since I am perforce using C-speak, I cannot
| change
On 24/04/17 11:22, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
I would be surpised if init.c was Fortran. Anyway...
It isn't of course. But it is the device used for "registering
routines" of all both flavours (i.e. both C and Fortran).
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
Univ
On 24/04/17 11:36, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/04/2017 6:18 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 23/04/17 23:05, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Looks like
extern void F77_NAME(mnnd)(double *, double *, int *, double *,
double *);
to me.
One more (I hope it's the last!) question:
One of my subroutine
On 24/04/17 12:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/04/2017 7:53 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 24/04/17 11:36, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/04/2017 6:18 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 23/04/17 23:05, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Looks like
extern void F77_NAME(mnnd)(double *, double *, int *, double *,
double
e me
with guidance as to what I *should* be doing?
Ta.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
On 09/11/17 23:06, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Ah, yes. Of course! Duh! (Slaps forehead vigorously!)
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
___
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for me:
\newcommand
... Mr. Speaker.
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for
On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
[Rolf Turner wrote:]
... when I do the "R CMD
build" thing, when it comes to the "* building the PDF package manual"
step it says "Hmm ... looks like a package" (no shit, Sherlock!) and
emits a huge amount of verbose
On 10/11/17 13:10, François Michonneau wrote:
A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros
in their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand&type=Code
Thanks. Looking into it.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZ
On 10/11/17 09:29, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and
On 12/11/17 08:08, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
It is more subtle than that.
\Sexpr triggers the creation of "partial Rd database" which becomes part of the
built package (the tar.gz file), although what exactly happens may also depend on 'stage'
options of the \Sexpr's.
... However when I do the
pful.
Of course I could just write "Weiss", but that's *so* non-U! :-)
Thanks for any ideas.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-de
On 06/01/18 16:19, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 2018-01-05 20:52, Rolf Turner wrote:
In a help file that I am writing I wish to cite an item by a bloke
whose surname is Weiß.
Write it "Weiss".
See "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F";.
That na
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:09:34 -0500
Spencer Graves wrote:
> Hello, All:
>
>
> "R CMD check Ecfun_0.2-5.tar.gz" with R 4.1.0 under macOS
> 11.4 gave "Warning in dir.create(vd2 <- "vign_test") : 'vign_test'
> already exists". It ultimately said, "Status: OK", so maybe I
> shouldn't worr
nstance. Elsewise
ambiguities will ensue.
As I say --- I think this can all be made to work. But
Am I missing some "obvious" strategy? I.e. is there a
better/simpler/less convoluted way of handling this problem?
Grateful for any pearls of wisdom.
chee
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:03:41 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 21/10/2021 12:40 a.m., Andrew Simmons wrote:
> > I think the simplest answer is to store the variable in the
> > functions frame. I'm assuming here that the only plot.foo needs
> > access to .fooInfo, if not this can be changed.
> >
ended to be called directly by the
> user.
> }
> \author{Hoo Hee
> \email{hoo@somewhere.otr}
> }
> \keyword{internal}
Then if someone types, e.g., "help(clyde)" they get the processed
form of the forgoing *.Rd file displayed, and are t
om shooting themselves in the foot. However if they
really want to shoot themselves in the foot, that's their call.
Anyway, users can always get at non-exported functions using ":::".
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:19:06 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> However, some users are package writers. Once their package is on
> CRAN, it can be really inconvenient for you to change the behaviour
> of internal functions that they use, because CRAN will object if your
> change breaks their te
e that the latest versions are used).
Despite this, you can expect to have correspondence with CRAN about
such problems.
Allow plenty of time between submitting successive sub-packages.
Give plenty of notice to users and maintainers of dependent packages.
Hope this helps.
cheers,
Rolf Turner (on
ge AQLSChemes was
> removed from CRAN, and what do I need to do to restore it to CRAN?
As Roy Mendelssohn has pointed out, AQLSChemes is there on CRAN.
Perhaps you need to re-install it on your machine.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 10:42:54 +1300
Rolf Turner wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:01:18 -0600
> John Lawson wrote:
>
> > I published the R Package AQLSChemes on CRAN in May 2022. The book
> > "An Introduction to Acceptance Sampling and SPC with R" was
> &g
packageStartupMessage(paste(pkg, ver))
> msg <- paste("\n This package, \"foo\" is now",
> " deprecated. Users",
> "\n should install and use its",
> " successor \"bar\".\n&q
e latest versions are used).
Despite this, you can expect to have correspondence with CRAN about
such problems.
Allow plenty of time between submitting successive sub-packages.
Give plenty of notice to users and maintainers of dependent packages.
Hope this helps.
cheers,
Rolf Turner (on behal
I'm having a problem please excuse the noise.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:22:34 +0300
Ivan Krylov wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:31:31 +
> Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> > I do not understand:
>
> >* the reference to inst/doc (there is no such directory)
>
> When you run R CMD build in order to produce a new Iso
I do to resolve this problem?
I guess I could simply *not* Suggest ionChannelData. But what then, is
the point of the option of including an Additional_repositories field in
the DESCRIPTION file?
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Sta
variables?
Can anyone give me any guidance? Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
___
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 05:34:26 -0400
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 19/10/2023 8:17 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
> >
> > In a package that I maintain, there are examples, in the *.Rd files,
> > that take an excruciatingly long time to run. This makes package
> > checking e
or offensive in the email from Prof. Ripley
that was copied and pasted into that posting.
I find *your* email far more offensive than anything that Prof. Ripley
has ever written. Get a life.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P.S. See fortunes::fortune(88).
R. T.
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department o
what seems an eternity (5 or
10 minutes).
Why does this step take so long? Surely the software just has to check
that there is web connection to a CRAN mirror. I would have thought
that this would be executed virtually instantaneously.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Departme
hough. I suspect
> the initial connection may have been faulty.
Well, it may not have been 10 minutes, but it was at least 5. The
problem is persistent/repeatable. I don't believe that there is any
faulty connection.
Thanks for the insight.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
near the bottom and click on "Eglhmm".
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
\name{monoCyteSim}
\alias{monoCyteSim}
\
o find the data sets bivarSim
and ccCM, whence the warning. Makes perfect sense now.
It turns out I can make the warning go away by removing the lines
\usage{
bivarSim
ccSim
}
They serve no useful purpose and are not required.
Thanks again.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research
gest an
explanation for this phenomenon? (I *hate* being ignored! 😊️ )
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
___
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:19:41 -0600
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 23 February 2024 at 15:53, Leo Mada wrote:
> | Dear Dirk & R-Members,
> |
> | It seems that the version number is not incremented:
> | # Archived
> | arrow_14.0.2.1.tar.gz 2024-02-08 11:57 3.9M
> | # Pending
> | arrow_14.0.
Could
> it be a good idea to add this on CRAN? If yes, how can I help?
>
Sounds like an excellent idea to me, but I am not really qualified to
judge. Most of this stuff is was over my head.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of
rates me is that I was *sure* I had saved the emails
pertaining to this discussion, but now I cannot find any trace of what I thought I'd saved!]
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 11:39:28 +1100
Hugh Parsonage wrote:
> It would have been helpful for that person to specify their candidate
> regex, rather than just saying it could be simpler.
Actually they *did* specify; the problem was that my ageing senile
memory could not recall the specification.
devtools seemed to get installed. Now "library(devtools)" runs without
error, so I am happy with my own situation. However there seems to be
a problem with the devtools package on CRAN, which ought to be fixed.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department
Well, I just uninstalled the devtools that I had installed from github
and ran
install.packages("devtools",lib="/home/rolf/Rlib")
No error message this time; the install went just fine.
The explanation may lie in the plethora of packages that I re-installed
when I invoked
remotes::ins
I submitted a package to winbuilder, yesterday. Twice. No response of
any sort. Is the system down, for some reason? Anyone know? Ta.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 10:18:27 +0200
Uwe Ligges wrote:
> Not that I know, which queue do you mean?
Apologies for my ignorance but I don't understand the question. I did
not choose a "queue". I simply (as I have always done in the past)
pointed my browser at https://win-builder.r-project.org/ .
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:20:00 +0200
Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
> Strange. Your package has been processed. Have you tried again?
> Are you sure the maintainer address is specified correctly and that
> the auto generated message did not make it onto your spam box?
>
> If it still does not work, please s
com/rolfTurner/kanova.git
Can anyone give me some avuncular advice as to how:
(a) to get rhub_check() to use the pre-compiled file testStat.pdf, or
(b) to make pdflatex available to rhub_check()
(c) to do something else that will permit me to build a Windoze binary
using rhub?
Grateful for a
Thanks to Ivan Krylov and Dirk Eddelbuettel who came to my rescue.
At first I thought that Dirk's suggestion ("the zero-dependency
approach" due to Mark van der Loo) was exactly what I needed. But this
turned out not to work; rhub_check() still failed with a complaint
about needing pdflatex.
I
ales that cannot represent
the encoded form). (This is
intended to be used for individual words, not whole sentences or
paragraphs.)
Hence a preamble with, e.g.
\encoding{latin1}
or
\encoding{UTF-8}
and later writing \enc{Weiß}{Weiss} seems most appropriate here.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On
On 08/02/18 07:49, Rami Krispin wrote:
I follow the example of the R Packages book about depreciating a function
It would be helpful if you were to distinguish between the words
"deprecate" and "depreciate". They are *VERY* different words.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
tly = TRUE)) {
cat("Package 'loon' is not available.\n")
cat("Sorry 'bout that, chief!\n")
return(invisible())
}
Thereby no error is thrown. The user may be unhappy with the result,
but he or she would have been similarly unhappy with the
On 19/05/18 07:44, Ben Bolker wrote:
I notice that when I say help(package="MASS") I get separate indices
for functions and data sets. AFAICT this doesn't seem to occur in other
packages that have both functions and data sets (e.g. mgcv, lattice,
lme4), despite the tags \docType{data} and
gelog
(and it is also prudent to keep a Changelog!) to the effect "Version
i.j-k never installed on CRAN".
But as I said, I am no expert. Younger and wiser heads may chip in with
advice that is more sound.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistic
ence is that AssetPricing involves no dynamically loaded
Fortran code, whereas the package that I am currently fooling about with
*does* involve such code. (But neither "foo()" not "bar()" make direct
calls to .Fortran().)
Grateful for any insights.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
h wrote:
On 08/07/2018 6:57 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Recently I experimented with assigning a variable within the environment
of a function in a package that I am developing. Slightly more
explicitly:
In a function "foo()" in the package, I have lines like:
big <- 42
assign(
Fortune nomination!!!
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
On 14/07/18 11:52, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/07/2018 11:10 PM, R. Mark Sharp wrote:
I had a few week development hiatus with
github.com/rmsharp/np
) .Options is created in the *base*
package, not in the global environment.
E.g.:
# Freshly started R session.
> find(".Options")
[1] "package:base"
> options(mung="gorp")
> find(".Options")
[1] "package:base"
> options("mung"
point me in the
direction of correctness?
Note that there is indeed a function cpp_object_initializer() in the
Rcpp package.
If more detail is required in order for guidance to be provided I am of
course more than happy to supply such detail.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research F
Thanks Dirk. Your suggestion worked perfectly. (See inline below.)
On 1/18/19 2:50 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 18 January 2019 at 11:59, Rolf Turner wrote:
|
| I am build a package in which there is a function which calls upon the
| function brm() from the brms package.
|
| In my
On 1/18/19 4:08 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 18 January 2019 at 15:13, Rolf Turner wrote:
|
| Thanks Dirk. Your suggestion worked perfectly. (See inline below.)
Glad to hear.
Something is off the rocker here as you should not have to do anything here
besides importing brms::brm
It's hard to be sure without seeing your package, but it *sounds* as
though you have a data set "Brom" (in /data ?) but you have
*documented* a data set named "brom". So you should either change the
name of the data set to "brom" or change your help file to document "Brom".
It is of course
On 22/03/19 11:18 PM, Jim Lemon wrote:
Hi,
I have been attempting to check a new version of the prettyR package,
and have struck a difficult problem. The check fails at the
installation, and when I track the error, it is "Unexpected end of
input" in the xtab function. I have tried a number of
you that you should have done
R CMD check prabclus_2.3-1.tar.gz
(the latter being what "R CMD build prabclus" creates).
If you did in fact do "R CMD check prabclus_2.3-1.tar.gz" then I
apologise for being patronising. In this case I have no insight
whatever as to wha
should do something about this note. (Non-portability
is indeed an egregious sin.) How can I tell gcc not to use these flags?
Note that the NOTE does not arise unless I use the "--as-cran" flag.
Thanks for any insight.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P.S. I am running Ubuntu 18.04. Happy to suppl
On 4/06/19 4:51 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 4 June 2019 at 16:42, Rolf Turner wrote:
| I am working on a revision of my Iso package (which hasn't been revised
| for quite a while) and have added in registration of Fortran routines
| that are called directly by .Fortran() in R func
I may well be toadally out to luntch here (if so please excuse the added
noise) but perhaps the following may be of some help or relevance.
In a package that I wrote, I wanted to include the ß symbol in *.Rda
file. After a lot of thrashing about (and seeking advice from younger
and wiser h
rather
tedious. Is there any to get some diagnostic output as to, e.g. which
example is being checked at the given moment? Doing R CMD check --help
does not reveal any useful looking options.
Thanks for any tips.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
Unive
Many thanks to Henrik Bengtsson and Martin Maechler for pointing out
that I can monitor progress by looking at the file
"mypkg.Rcheck/mypkg-Ex.Rout"
e.g. by using "tail -f". This strategy indeed revealed where the hangup
was happening. I wrapped a line of the examples in \dontrun{} an
small so as to reduce
the amount of time needed for checking). The default value is nrep=100.
R.
Iñaki
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 11:32, Rolf Turner wrote:
Many thanks to Henrik Bengtsson and Martin Maechler for pointing out
that I can monitor progress by looking at the file
"my
On 2/07/19 11:13 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Could R CMD check be using valgrind to run the examples? Valgrind has
to interpret CPU instructions manually to be able to warn about
results of code execution depending on memory values it considers
undefined, so it is much slower than execution on a re
acked down which example was the culprit (by doing
tail -f pkge-Ex.Rout), that I could use \dontrun{} on all of the *other*
examples and get the same puzzling behaviour. This speeded up the
process considerably.
Don't know if there is any message to take away from all of the
foregoing (othe
haps I'm overlooking
something) any equivalent in the Rd syntax of \hspace{} in LaTeX.
Can anyone suggest any possibilities?
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
___
On 13/07/19 9:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/07/2019 9:43 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
This is fussing over a very minor issue, but ... well, I have OCD, I
guess.
I've tried adding extra "blank" columns between my real columns (extra
\tab's with blank fields) but
/what is the downside of setting version=2?
What are the consequences/what is the downside of adding the dependency
on R >= 3.5.0 into my DESCRIPTION file?
Who gets shafted by each of these two possibilities?
Which is recommended?
Grateful for any pearls of wisdom.
cheers,
Rolf Turn
ibility in a package, personally I would use version 2.
That's my gut reaction as well. Thanks for the advice.
cheers,
Rolf
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 4:52 PM Rolf Turner <mailto:r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz>> wrote:
In a package (say "clyde") that I am building
On 15/07/19 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14/07/2019 7:52 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote:
In a package (say "clyde") that I am building I save a number of
datasets in clyde/data via something like:
save(melvin,file="~//clyde/data/melvin.rda")
When I build "clyde
uot;) in my NAMESPACE file? What else
can I try?
Thanks for any insights.
[1] Not to be confused with a birth control device.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P.S. I could probably, with a bit of effort, put together a toy package
that would yield a reprex, if this is deemed necessary.
R. T.
--
Honorar
On 14/08/19 8:30 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 14 August 2019 at 17:44, Rolf Turner wrote:
| > Error in cpp_object_initializer(.self, .refClassDef, ...) :
| > could not find function "cpp_object_initializer"
This can happen when a package using Rcpp Modules is not fully lo
I am developing a package ("ldEst" --- lethal dose estimation) for a
group of consulting clients. (The package may in the future be released
upon the unsuspecting public, but for the moment it has to stay
confidential, sad to say.)
The clients run Windoze (sad to say). In the past I have
ed me.
Sorry for the noise.
cheers,
Rolf
On 5/11/19 12:37 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I am developing a package ("ldEst" --- lethal dose estimation) for a
group of consulting clients. (The package may in the future be released
upon the unsuspecting public, but for the moment
any hope of getting a useful
response. I, at least, have no idea what you are talking about. It is
possible, of course, that other, more enlightened, readers of this list
may understand immediately.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of
On 4/02/20 3:03 am, profjohn wrote:
While there are huge benefits to upgrading, there is pain. It's that
pain that keeps people on OS versions that are older but still in the
LTS [1] period.
Fortune nomination!
cheers,
Rolf
[1] Long Term Support
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Departmen
Submitted a package about 18 hours ago, and so far not a
sausage. Although it's churlish to complain, one gets used to a service
that has been provided and gets annoyed when the service disappears.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of A
On 1/03/20 11:44 am, Max Kuhn wrote:
On February 29, 2020 at 5:06:35 PM, Rolf Turner (r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz
<mailto:r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz>) wrote:
On 1/03/20 2:23 am, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Is it down again? I'm seeing the same problem again.
> Hadley
>
> On Sa
On 1/03/20 2:40 pm, Hugh Parsonage wrote:
Are CRAN staff located in Europe only? Is there a case to have a limited
staff across multiple timezones with a rolling roster? Obviously if
something is reported it’s best if it can be actioned immediately.
Just to be clear, it is winbuilder, and n
On 5/03/20 9:04 pm, Tomas Kalibera wrote:
On 3/5/20 4:26 AM, John Lawson wrote:
I see this error on the CRAN Check report
Fatal error: the condition has length > 1
The problem is that the condition t1 == "I" & t2 == "(" of the if
statement in the code is not a scalar. Even though this
;t be sure. Maybe I just *intended* to,
but then forgot, or messed up the submission procedure, or buggered
something else up. There seems to be no way to check that I really did
make a submission. Such a facility would be, uh, nice. Said he,
plaintively.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary R
On 6/03/20 11:41 am, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
1. I'd guess it helps Uwe a bit you clarify exactly which queue you
think is stuck - otherwise he has to check them all. They're independent.
Yeah. Sorry. It's the R-release queue.
2. You can look at the different win-builder queues yourself vi
On 6/03/20 11:14 am, Ben Bolker wrote:
It's probably been suggested already in this thread, but perhaps
rhub would work for you as an alternative?
Quite possibly, but I have no real idea what "rhub" is. I've seen it
referred to many times but the references always assume that you know
ctu, took me to a page from
which I could download blah_1.1-1.zip, and this was indeed the required
Windoze binary.
Ta-da!!! Victory. I hope that those who are as mentally handicapped as
I am find the foregoing useful.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
that that can on occasion have unfortunate
consequences.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.et
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo