Recently I experimented with assigning a variable within the environment of a function in a package that I am developing. Slightly more explicitly:

In a function "foo()" in the package, I have lines like:

   big <- 42
   assign("big",big,envir=environment(bar))

where "bar()" is another function in the package.

This causes an error to be thrown:

Error in assign("big", big, envir = environment(bar)) : cannot add bindings to a locked environment

The reason that I am puzzled about this is that I used this syntax repeatedly in my CRAN package "AssetPricing". In this latter package the syntax seems to work flawlessly. No errors are thrown. No mention of "locked environments".

Why would environments get "locked" in the package that I am currently fooling about with, but not in the AssetPricing package? Is there anything that I can do to keep environments from getting "locked"?

Can anyone suggest where I should start looking for differences in the nature of the two packages?

I could possibly give more detail, but I have no idea as to what might be relevant.

One difference is that AssetPricing involves no dynamically loaded Fortran code, whereas the package that I am currently fooling about with *does* involve such code. (But neither "foo()" not "bar()" make direct calls to .Fortran().)

Grateful for any insights.

cheers,

Rolf Turner

--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to