On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:19:41 -0600
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 23 February 2024 at 15:53, Leo Mada wrote:
> | Dear Dirk & R-Members,
> |
> | It seems that the version number is not incremented:
> | # Archived
> | arrow_14.0.2.1.tar.gz 2024-02-08 11:57 3.9M
> | # Pending
> | arrow_14.0.2.1.tar.gz 2024-02-08 18:24 3.9M
> |
> | Maybe this is the reason why it got stuck in "pending".
>
> No it is not.
>
> The hint to increase version numbers on re-submission is a weaker
> 'should' or 'might', not a strong 'must'.
>
> I have uploaded a few packages to CRAN over the last two decades, and
> like others have made mistakes requiring iterations. I have not once
> increased a version number.
That's as may be but IMHO (and AFAICS) it never hurts to increment the
version number, even if you've only corrected a trivial glitch.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Honorary Research Fellow
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone:
+64-9-373-7599 ext. 89622
Home phone: +64-9-480-4619
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
