I don't think that is related. I just updated to the newest version of R
(4.1.2) and that resolved the issue.
Thank you for your time!
Eric.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:56 AM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 10/12/2021 11:08 a.m., Eric Weine wrote:
> > That does not solve the issue.
> >
> > First, th
On 10/12/2021 11:08 a.m., Eric Weine wrote:
That does not solve the issue.
First, the html file that's already there is what is desired. But I
believe that regardless R CMD will rebuild the package vignettes from
scratch. I tried removing the html and recreating the package but I end
up with
That does not solve the issue.
First, the html file that's already there is what is desired. But I believe
that regardless R CMD will rebuild the package vignettes from scratch. I
tried removing the html and recreating the package but I end up with the
same result in the .tar.gz file. The central
Just delete the .html output from earlier runs before you run R CMD
build, and it will have no choice but to rebuild them.
Duncan Murdoch
On 10/12/2021 9:29 a.m., Eric Weine wrote:
Hello,
Sorry yes, I think that my initial post on stack overflow is a bit
misleading. I have checked the file t
Hello,
Sorry yes, I think that my initial post on stack overflow is a bit
misleading. I have checked the file that is built when I run "R CMD build
...", and it looks like what is on CRAN. The question is why is that
different from when I run "devtools::build_vignette" or when I just knit
the vign
On 09/12/2021 5:41 p.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
Eric,
did you check the contents of the package file you submitted? The session info
in the vignette is quite old, and the build has been packaged by you so I don't
think it has anything to do with CRAN, but to make sure, check the file you
submit