Re: Transaction ID suggestions

2007-08-29 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:04:56 -0400 (EDT) > > No, it should be remote_IP.remote_port.local_port and should include a > transaction_within_connection count. I don't think that pid adds anything. Isn't localport always

connections hanging around forever

2007-08-29 Thread Chris Garrigues
nder tcpserver? Also, why does the default run script default to -c 10; that seems awfully low to me. Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street Austin, TX 78701-179

Re: connections hanging around forever

2007-08-29 Thread Chris Garrigues
unning for more than one hour, the client must > be saying something during this time. > You can try to lower the timeout parameter. Mine is 120s (maybe a > little short, but it works quite well). > > > Sydney. -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solu

use of whitelistrcpt in greylisting plugin

2007-08-29 Thread Chris Garrigues
to understand the whitelisting protocol between plugins? Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street Austin, TX 78701-1798 http://www.trinsics.com/blog http://www.t

Re: use of whitelistrcpt in greylisting plugin

2007-08-29 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:02:14 -0500 > > I'm trying to write a plugin which will sit in front of the greylisting > plugin > and keep it from greylisting messages to certain addresses. > > I thought from my in

Re: connections hanging around forever

2007-08-31 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:27:42 -0500 > > Hi all, > > I've been using qpsmtpd for about 6 months now but I've just signed up for > this list. I recently upgraded to 0.40 and I'm running on a modified

Re: connections hanging around forever

2007-08-31 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:09:52 -0500 > > > From: Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:49:02 -0400 (EDT) > > > > > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Chris Garrigues wrote: &

Re: connections hanging around forever

2007-08-31 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:49:02 -0400 (EDT) > > > On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > >> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:27:42 -0500 > ... >

Re: use of whitelistrcpt in greylisting plugin

2007-09-02 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:02:21 -0500 > > > From: Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:02:14 -0500 > > > > I'm trying to write a plugin which will sit in front of

Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-05 Thread Chris Garrigues
eturn(OK) and the logic for testing rcpthosts get moved to check_relay? Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street Austin, TX 78701-1798 http://www.trinsics.com/blog http://w

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-05 Thread Chris Garrigues
plugins is utterly chaotic. Since we're at 0.40, I guess that's okay, but by 1.0 I hope it's no longer true. Is there a roadmap which states when along the way the distribution will include fixes like this one and some documentation on the use of notes for whitelists and oth

Re: Roll your own vs. default distro (was: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?)

2007-09-06 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:33:33 +0200 > > Chris Garrigues wrote: > > Two weeks into membership on this list and I'm beginning to realize that > > the > > design of plugins is utterly chaotic. Since we

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-06 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 00:49:06 -0700 > > > On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > > okay...you've demonstrated that the other more sensible way works > > fine...so wh

I disabled the greylisting plugin last night

2007-09-07 Thread Chris Garrigues
base from the command line. Before I start writing code, however, I really should look at what else is out there first. Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President 710-B West 14th Street

New greylist plugin

2007-09-20 Thread Chris Garrigues
subnet together for sites that may send a message from more than one address on a network. More information and a link to the software may be found on my blog at: http://www.trinsics.com/blog/?p=59 Chris -- Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions President

Re: greylisting and relaying

2008-05-08 Thread Chris Garrigues
I write my own greylisting plugin some time ago due to problems I had with the one included. I posted it on this list, but never got any comments on it. See http://www.trinsics.com/blog/?p=59 I've been using it on my firewalls since september with no problems at all. Chris On Ma

Re: greylisting and relaying

2008-05-08 Thread Chris Garrigues
Thanks for the belated feedback. BTW, I'd have no problem with this being included in the distribution. Chris On May 8, 2008, at 5:34 PM, James Turnbull wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Garrigues wrote: I write my own greylisting plugin some time ago d