> From: "Peter J. Holzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:36:37 +0200 > > > Why doesn't rcpt_ok just return(OK) and the logic for testing rcpthosts get > > moved to check_relay? > > Have a look at > http://svn.perl.org/viewcvs/qpsmtpd/contrib/hjp/rcpt_accept/rcpt_accept?view=markup&rev=638
okay...you've demonstrated that the other more sensible way works fine...so why
does the default distribution do it the way it does?
Two weeks into membership on this list and I'm beginning to realize that the
design of plugins is utterly chaotic. Since we're at 0.40, I guess that's
okay, but by 1.0 I hope it's no longer true. Is there a roadmap which states
when along the way the distribution will include fixes like this one and
some documentation on the use of notes for whitelists and other stuff like
that?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 710-B West 14th Street
Austin, TX 78701-1798
http://www.trinsics.com/blog
http://www.trinsics.com 512-322-0180
Would you rather proactively pay for
uptime or reactively pay for downtime?
Trinsic Solutions
Your Trusted Friends in Proactive IT.
pgphaXlZWYJdG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
