Jason Haar wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:11:32AM -0400, Vee Persaud wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone had a solution to the following problem that I
> > get when I do a 'make test' for qmail-scanner-1.22. I'm on a Solaris 9 box
> > and this is what I get:
> >
> > unix passed to setlogsoc
and I'll see how it goes.
Thx
Vee Persaud
NCS
748-2133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jason Haar
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:11:32AM -0400, Vee Persaud wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had a solution to the following problem that I
> get when I do a 'make test' for qmail-scanner-1.22. I'm on a Solaris 9 box
> and this is what I get:
>
> unix passed to setlogsock, but path not available at /
What OS ? I'm running on Solaris 9.
Vee Persaud
NCS
748-2133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]setlogsock
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Chuck
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]setlogsock issue installing
> qmail-scanner
>
>
> On Wed
On Wed May 19 2004 11:27 am, Vee Persaud wrote:
> I'm using Perl 5.8.0
>
> I saw on the archive from 2002 that Perl 5.8 and Q-S are not compatible.
> Is it still not compatible ???
wer are using 5.8.2 with it just fine. i believe we also used 5.8.0 previously
with no trouble. not 100% sure of
I'm using Perl 5.8.0
I saw on the archive from 2002 that Perl 5.8 and Q-S are not compatible. Is it still
not compatible ???
Thx
Vee Persaud
NCS
748-2133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Beh
