On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:47:45 +0900, Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> FYI it looks like Mike Tedder is correct - there is a bug that is
> affecting Message-ID parsing in Qmail-Scanner 2.0[34]
>
> I am in the final testing phase of 2.05 which will fix the problem. It
&g
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:09:21 +0900, Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Tedder wrote:
>> I reverted back to qs-2.02 a few days ago, and so far all mails are
>> coming in with the Message-ID in the header intact. So the problem is
>> indeed with qmail-sc
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:26:01 +0900, Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Well, you have give me a hint.. I was using qs-2.02st, SA-3.2.4 and I
> haven't seen the issue but I didn't pay atention to it before the
> release of 2.04.
[clip]
> Maybe you can install 2.02st and enabled 's
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:23:46 +0900, Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 17:39 +0900 19-06-2008, Mike Tedder wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently performed an update installation of SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and
>> qmail-scanner 1.24 to their
Hello all,
I recently performed an update installation of SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and
qmail-scanner 1.24 to their latest versions -- 3.2.5 and 2.04 --
respectively. After doing the update, I noticed that for most of my
mails (not all of them) now have their Message-IDs removed, and
SpamAssassin is tag
