RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Performance Optimization?

2003-03-28 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:33 PM > To: Dallas Engelken > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Performance Optimization? > > > How busy is busy? ~ 50k/day successfully delivered. I don

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Performance Optimization?

2003-03-28 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 2:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Performance Optimization? > > > Hi there! > > Using qmail-scanner on a *very* busy mail server, with Spam > Assassin an

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + SpamAssassin question/doubt

2003-03-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
I call spamc via my maildrop .mailfilter, that way i can pull userprefs for that specific vpopmail user from my sql prefs. VPOP="| /var/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox" VHOME=`/var/vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] `test -d $VHOME/Mail

[Qmail-scanner-general]FW: [Persistentperl-users] Followup to my STDOUT issue

2003-03-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
And lastly before I put this to rest... > -Original Message- > From: Sam Horrocks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:16 PM > To: Dallas Engelken > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Persistentperl-users] Follow

[Qmail-scanner-general]FW: [Persistentperl-users] Followup to my STDOUT issue

2003-03-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
FYI on getting PersistentPerl going with Qmail-Scanner... > -Original Message- > From: Sam Horrocks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:11 PM > To: Dallas Engelken > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Persistentperl-

[Qmail-scanner-general]RE: [Speedycgi-users] Help with STDOUT

2003-03-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
more info... for those interested in the PersistentPerl threads.. Dallas > -Original Message- > From: Sam Horrocks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:04 PM > To: Dallas Engelken > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation

2003-03-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
age- > From: Tren Blackburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:17 AM > To: Dallas Engelken > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation > > > Hi Dallas; > > I'm not sure if this is of any help at all, but I found

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation

2003-03-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Kuuse - Red Antigua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:32 AM > To: Dallas Engelken > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation > > > Very interesting discussion. > Anyon

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation

2003-03-11 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Dallas Engelken > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:27 PM > To: Rick Romero; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rick Romero [

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation

2003-03-11 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Rick Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Expected Performance Degradation > > > On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 13:05, Ryan Finnie wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, D.Monroe

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC

2003-03-02 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Dallas Engelken wrote: > > Ya, th

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC

2003-02-28 Thread Dallas Engelken
th... $nowtime = sprintf "%04d/%02d/%02d %02d:%02d:%02d", $year+1900, $mon+1, $mday, $hour, $min, $sec; note, the first one is "my $nowtime", dont copy and paste over it or "use strict" will complain and mail will stop processing. Good Luck, Dallas Engelken NMGI rfc_date_template.patch Description: rfc_date_template.patch

[Qmail-scanner-general]BUG in sub-spamassassin.pl + FIX

2003-02-25 Thread Dallas Engelken
header) The fix is attached as a diff. If anyone sees anything wrong with the information provided above, please let me know. Feedback is welcome! Dallas Engelken Network Management Group, Inc. - DoubleCheck Email Manager - http://www.nmgi.com/doublecheck/ --- subs-spamassassin.pl.old

[Qmail-scanner-general]VirusScan before PerlScan?

2002-11-14 Thread Dallas Engelken
Why is it not this way? I would rather have a message telling me it found the Magistr virus instead of a crummy .pif filetype not accepted. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click he

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]W32/Bride bypasses qmail-scanner

2002-11-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Doug Monroe [mailto:doug@;planetconnect.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:24 PM > To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]W32/Bride bypasses qmail-scanner > > > Doug Monroe wrote: > &

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]W32/Bride bypasses qmail-scanner

2002-11-13 Thread Dallas Engelken
Does anyone have a copy of a message with the braid virus that they could post publicly on a web site so I could test my qmail-scanner with? Thx --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about your web server security? Click here f

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]large attachments marked as spam

2002-11-07 Thread Dallas Engelken
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:08:43PM -0600, Dallas Engelken wrote: > > > Nov 6 11:28:15 mail qmail-scanner[25804]: Clear:SA:1(0/0): > > > This places the header X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=0 > required=0 in the > > email > > > > Ya, the spam sub is screw

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]large attachments marked as spam

2002-11-06 Thread Dallas Engelken
> Nov 6 11:28:15 mail qmail-scanner[25804]: Clear:SA:1(0/0): > This places the header X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=0 required=0 in the email Ya, the spam sub is screwed. Here is the diff fix for 1.15 sub-spamassassin.pl below. It changes the if statement to contain a sa_max greater than (not spam),

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner resource problems

2002-10-29 Thread Dallas Engelken
> >I would highly recommended tarpitting, because there is no > way to control > that with control/databytes or perlscanner, since it is >just > 1 email being > sent with multiple rcpt to's. > >Dallas > > 1. What do you mean, "tarpitting"? http://www.palomine.net/qmail/tarpit.html > 2. Qmail 1 me

[Qmail-scanner-general]perlscan with unzip = yes

2002-10-29 Thread Dallas Engelken
If I disallow all .exe files via perlscanner and enable unzipping of the message, can I not zip the .exe file up and send it in a zip? We all know not to send plain .exe files via email, but isnt zipping them up normal practice? Dallas ---

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner resource problems

2002-10-29 Thread Dallas Engelken
> > Hi all, > I have installed qmail-scanner + avpdaemon successfully > on my qmail > server. Everything worked till now. One local user have > decided to send 100 > e-mail 3 megabytes each. After 1 or less min, my server has stopped > responding. What can I do to limit the perlscanner? > I wo

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]autoupdaters -> update_macafee

2002-09-26 Thread Dallas Engelken
rent update.ini No update required - - Checking for update.ini - File update.ini exists. - Moving update.ini to tmp file. - Downloading current update.ini from ftp://ftp.nai.com. - Downloaded update.ini OK - MD5 Checksum match: No DAT update requi

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]autoupdaters -> update_macafee

2002-09-18 Thread Dallas Engelken
> > > What script? I'd like to see it. > > > > > > Thanks, I'll let you know if it works for me. > > > > I'm referring to the script that is in ../qmail-scanner-1.14/autoupdaters/update_macafee --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]autoupdaters -> update_macafee

2002-09-18 Thread Dallas Engelken
> What script? I'd like to see it. > > > Thanks, I'll let you know if it works for me. > I'm referring to the script that is in ../qmail-scanner-1.14/autoupdaters/update_macafee --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to

[Qmail-scanner-general]autoupdaters -> update_macafee

2002-09-18 Thread Dallas Engelken
does this script just hang for everyone else? just curious. dallas --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]injecting /var/spool/qmailscan/archives/new/* back into the qmailqueue

2002-09-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
> Is it possible to inject the contents of > /var/spool/qmailscan/archives/new > back into the qmail queue, and if so, how would this be done? > > Michael Martinez > System Administrator > create a file... for example. #!/bin/bash # filename: inject.sh cat $1 | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject ch

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmailqueue patch question

2002-08-27 Thread Dallas Engelken
> Listers, > > How long is the qmailqueue patch supposed to run? > I'll tell you what I've done and you can tell me where I've > gone off. I > downloaded the qmqil-1.03.tar.gz and unzipped it. Put the > patch in the > same folder (qmail-1.03) and ran "patch -p1 qmailqueue-patch" at the > comma

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]No virus reported

2002-08-09 Thread Dallas Engelken
> My perl is far from perfect but wont this statement match on any > version? > > if ($virus_type =~ /$virus/i) { > > klez =~ klez.h > or > klez =~ Klez.h > or > klez =~ Klez.Z > > Would all match yes/no? I thought this type of compare worked like a > grep. yes. /$virus/i means match the te

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Can't seem to get qmailqueue patch to work.

2002-07-30 Thread Dallas Engelken
> Listers! > > I am trying to get the scanner to work on my RH7.3 qvcs setup and > just can't figure out what to do with the qmailqueue-patch email I > found. Any assistance is welcome. > qmailqueue-patch attached... # cp qmailqueue-patch qmail-1.03/ # cd qmail-1.03 # patch -p1 < qmailqueu

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]quarantine

2002-07-16 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Trey Nolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]quarantine > > > > This is probably an easy question that has been answered before, so be > gentle. > > Is there a way t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin direction

2002-07-02 Thread Dallas Engelken
> I know this is _not_ an SA group, but QS is not detecting > that I have it > installed. I presume it is installed correctly since I can pipe the > sample message that comes with SA through it and it detects > it. When I > run QS configure script it sees that it is there, but says it is not

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmailqueue patch

2002-05-22 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Marlon T. Pita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmailqueue patch > > > I had a working qmail mta comes with my plesk installation. I want to > install the qmail-scanner

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Anyone using F-Prot ?

2002-05-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
> The price seems very reasonable. > Just purchased an Enterprise license today for a client. $450 per server. Very reasonable. I was talking to their sales team about licensing in the future, and they said they are looking at going per seat for email scanning by 2003. I asked him what lic

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner integration

2002-05-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
> Hi Dallas, > > I actually executed patch < qmailqueue.patch. > Do we need to execute this? > yes sorry. patch -p1 < qmailqueue.patch i was just walking through the steps in my head... hehe :) > > -Original Message- > > From: Dallas Engelken [m

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner integration

2002-05-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Ronneil Camara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner integration > > > I have patched qmail. Is it ok if I installed qmail first > before qmail-scanner? >

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner integration

2002-05-17 Thread Dallas Engelken
> I've got some questions again. My qmail has been running for > over a year now. > Problem is, I don't know if I have qmailqueue patch. Probably not. How > would I verify it? here is a script for you. #!/bin/sh # # Short script to check if QMAILQUEUE is applied # echo -e '#!/bin/sh\n\ntouch /t

[Qmail-scanner-general]What's with the RAV function

2002-05-14 Thread Dallas Engelken
sub-rav.pl has a function called `rav_scanner`, yet when you set up, 'rav' gets plugged into the @scanner_array. foreach $scanner (@scanner_array) { &{$scanner}; ... That code tries to execute a function named 'rav' which does not exist. The rav sub also has a problem detecting 'Inf

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]setuid

2002-05-14 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]setuid > > > Hi, > I installed qmail with vpopmail, then qmail-scanner on it. > When I am trying to send mail , in the