> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Dallas Engelken wrote: > > Ya, that bugged me also... I wrote a patch for it if you > want to use > > it, or just look at it and find and replace code in your already > > running system. This switches it to rfc complient > YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss > > format. The only date this patch does not effect is the > date in the > > received headers, which is correct in it's format of DD Month YYYY > > hh:mm:ss -0000 > > Can you explain just what that patch does? As it doesn't > alter the timestamp in the Received headers, just how could > this "fix" a problem with some spamtrap? > > From what I can see, your patch simply alters the timestamp > used in reports > - nothing to do with the email? >
I guess I didnt understand what the guy wanted in the first place... he didnt provide much information. The received header is the only date that QS places in the email, and i didnt see anything wrong there. \ Dallas ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
