G of memory. The new servers will be P4 3.2's and the old
ones are Duron 1200's.
Thank You,
Cody Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wilkshire.net
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for
don't crash, and get fixed when they do. This solution
would also probably let a lot of spam pass. Spammers realize that
higher MX servers are typically back-ups without all of the spam/virus
fighting protection offered by the lower MX servers, so they'll target
th
ail server starts to
get crushed under the weight again, add another virus relaying server,
remove clamd and qmail-scanner from the main mail server, take away it's
MX record, and life is golden.
Thank you,
Cody Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
330.934.0659
http://www.wilkshire.net
Jason Haar w
ECTED]/msg04568.html
&& and the explanation
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04574.html
.
Thank you,
Cody Baker
330.934.0659
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clive Eisen wrote:
Bu I see no evidence that clamd leaks - doeas anyone else?
Cody Baker wrote:
If clamd was hitting the soft
If clamd was hitting the softlimits then yes, clamd might affected but
the system as a whole would not be. Where as if it was just run
without supervision then clamd's leaks would continue to grow without
bound until blammo, the system crashes, much as it is in this case.
Cody
thing delivering to our users mailboxes
> except surgemail, otherwise too many user features will break. however,
> since the spam quarantine area can be defined separately and used via
spamd's
> web facility, can it work in that fashion?
>
> > Chuck wrote:
> > > On
It's funny this just came up because I just discovered D-Spam last evening.
It looks cool, but I really have my doubts that it could be incorperated at
the qmail-scanner level. It's designed to fit in between qmail-send and
qmail-local. I went to the #dspam channel on irc.freenode.net and asked a
think you should rethink using qmail-scanner for spam purposes,
it, in my opinion, doesn't provide the flexibility necessary for SPAM
filtering.
Cody Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Vpopmail Mailinglist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cody Baker&
You really have two options for this. Because of qmail-scanner's location
in the chain of all things qmail, it doesn't distinguish between incoming
and outgoing, and there's good reason for this. Mail sent to qmail-smtpd
and sub-sequentially to qmail-scanner can have both local and remote
targets
make
qmail-queue a script that calls qmail-scanner, and passes it's standard in
to it. In theory that should work, it's not ideal, but it would cover your
needs.
Cody Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
10 matches
Mail list logo
