com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> ___
> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
--
Chuck
"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended up
.
i have also seen definition files cause severe slowdowns in a/v scanners, and
soon as they were replaced, the problem went away.
> Could it be the antivirus processing problem? I am
> using Virus Scan for Linux v4.24.0
>
> Regards,
> rootlinux
>
> --- Chuck <[EMAIL P
ppened, :(
>
> Regards,
> rootlinux
>
> --- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed May 19 2004 11:54 am, root linux wrote:
> > hmm. odd. i am going to top-answer this one due to
> > its length. tail the queue
> > log and see if you can manually notice the
the hardware.
> At 07:17 AM 5/19/2004, Chuck wrote:
> >first examine message headers. At the end of the qmail-scanner-queue entry
> >will be a process time. with only a few exceptions it should NEVER exceed
> > 0.3 seconds. If it does, look for reasons why it is being del
anything else live on this machine or is
it dedicated to qmail?
Chuck
> Here is the mail message header: -
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 15388 invoked by uid 504); 19 May
> 2004 15:34:13 -
> Received
-
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
> Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
> 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id%62&alloc_ida84&op=Click
> __
gb of
quarantines in about 5 hrs of running, so I delete them all every 3 hours for
safety and to keep things running quickly. other than that, it looks like an
average semi-busy server to me.
Chuck
> Hi all,
>
> I have lots of the below process running when I run
> "ps -ef" at the c
Ever since I upgraded to qmail-scanner v 1.21, I am getting spamassassin
reports in my message bodies. I never had that before and do not want it.
How can I eliminate this?
--
Chuck
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
On Sun March 14 2004 06:31 pm, Cody Baker wrote:
> Chuck,
> In what fashion are you using qmail-scanner/Qmail with surgemail? I
> really don't know how to comment otherwise.
qmail lives on one machine and surgemail on another. qmail is set up strictly
as an smtp mail processin
.
> Chuck,
> In what fashion are you using qmail-scanner/Qmail with surgemail? I
> really don't know how to comment otherwise.
>
> ~Cody
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent
surgemail, otherwise too many user features will break. however,
since the spam quarantine area can be defined separately and used via spamd's
web facility, can it work in that fashion?
> Chuck wrote:
> > On Sun March 14 2004 12:29 pm, Cody Baker wrote:
> >
> > from all the
are that can learn.
> ok
> <[dmp]> Thats how most(all?) bayesian networks works.
> <[dmp]> If you got a collection of spams (and hams) you can feed it into
> dspam to get a quicker start.
> so essentially we could feed high and low spam assassin messages to
> this to get a
__
> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
--
Chuck
"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensO
/ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> ___
> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
--
Chuck
"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended
I have searched documentation and other places but find no answers. Can the
scanner automatically rename attachments regardless whether they are found
infected or not? I want to rename all *.exe or *.zip to *_exe and *_zip
before they are sent on to their destination.
--
Chuck
".
ed by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> ___
> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
the supplied 5.8.0 along with the suid rpm. i just dont like the
idea of a threaded perl in a production environment, heck even perl says not
to use it:)
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:39:06PM -0500, Chuck wrote:
> > I am currently setting up a replacement for this using redhat 9. This
_
> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
--
Chuck
"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScr
logs.
I'm baffled.
--
Chuck
"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath
or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose
for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...
19 matches
Mail list logo
