RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]QS 1.23 doesn't work when message to spam check is over 250K

2004-08-30 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> Can someone please confirm that QS 1.23 works fine for them > when spam > checking emails over 250K? That would help a great deal. > Cheers. > > -- > Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford > Information Services Division, Clifford Whitworth Building, > Salford

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]scanning email after delivery test

2004-06-25 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> > Do you have a patch available? Or a link? I use vpopvmail as well. > > -Dan > > > Its not my patch. Search Google for qmail-smtpd-chkusr patch by Antonio Nati. -- Ed. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Trainin

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]scanning email after delivery test

2004-06-25 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> Through watching the logs, I noticed scanning of emails for > delivery to users > that don't exist on my system. And when a spammer decides to > attach my domain > with random email addresses, it really kills my system. > > I was wondering if there is any way for QS to test to make > sure th

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]RE: SMTP error code

2004-05-13 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> But no-one has explained why it is better than the current system! > > Instead of giving a SMTP error, you get a personally written, > virus-specific > report send to your address. > > If the virus was generated by a trojan, neither option would > cause the user > to be notified. > > If thi

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Re: SMTP error code

2004-05-12 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> Well, I understand what you are proposing. I have tried this way my > self and after the tests I leave it... > > Look at the post Jason has sent after our posts of yesterday. "In my > opinion", actually, it is not a good practice to notify the sender, > because "almost" all the sender (except

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]RE: SMTP error code

2004-05-11 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> I'm eager to hear what Jason Haar has to say about this. I don't know > how error codes are generated in q-s so I can't really comment on the > usability of the above code, but in concept it looks like what I'm > suggesting. > > > -- > Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator > WingNET Internet

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general](no subject)

2004-04-28 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> > My recently installed qmail-scanner 1.21 under RH7.3 seems to be a > problem. The box it's on has been running stable qmail 1.03 for two > years and now freezes every other day. It'll respond to pings > but that's > it. > > The qmail-scanner log shows a reversing timestamp (the log > part i

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]MS Outlook sees double

2004-04-27 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> Hi, > > I am not really sure whether this is a qmail-scanner problem. But > thought I would ask here to see if anyone else has come > across a similar > problem. > > I have a > qmail+vpopmail+courier-imap+spamassassin+clamav+qmail-scanner > set up. A couple of my users are seeing a weird

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]log_details w/Solaris9 question

2004-04-23 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> Hi, > Does anyone running qmail-scanner on Solaris 9 has log_details setting > working? I have enabled log_details="syslog" setting in > qmail-scanner-queue.pl but no messages are added to syslog file. All > other programs including spamd log fine. I know there is a > problem with > Sys:Syslog

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Clamdscan verion in header?

2004-04-20 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> What am I missing here, why is it still stamping it 0.70-rc, > I have removed > all 0.70-rc files from my system even and can't seem to > figure out where it > is finding it. Even checking the date/version on the files > in the path it > is calling all look ok when called from the shell. > >

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Changing permissions?

2004-04-16 Thread Certainty Tech-Ed
> Hi, > I want to be able to manipulate the quarantine with a web interface.. > but can't because it's owned by qscand.nofiles and is rw-- > how can I get qscanner to wither change the permissions or the owner? > -- > Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Modify the single "umask(0077)" line in qma