On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:29:42 -0800 - "Kundra, Sachin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
> :allow, RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
I run it like this..
:allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/q
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:16:06 +0100 - Arnvid Karstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It came from a line like this
> add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_
> auto
Even with that fixed.. It has 2 status lines:
with qmail-scanner-1.24-mod
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:10:26 +0100 - Arnvid Karstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trance spamassassin-3.0.2-r1 # spamc -U /home/spamd/spamd <
> /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/trance11077625206933448
> X-Spam-Status: "Yes, score=15.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_1
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:43:48 +0100 - Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >That's the headers from the mail you just sent (and I'm replying to..)
> I don't like that 'X-Spam-Status: "No' header
> Notice that in your header there is an extra double quote (")
> And the configure script
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:50:02 +0100 - Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentoo really adds another patch after 1.24st, but I have installed
> SA-3.0.2 and tested it with 1.24st and 1.25st (I hope it will be in
> the page today), and I don't get that error.
Which error are you referin
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:06:09 +1300 - Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, I failed to mention that I'm running gentoo linux. I installed
> > with the command:
> > emerge mail-filter/qmail-scanner
> Oh - I was totally unaware GenToo was packaging Qmail-Scanner (gee,
> thanks guys
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:06:09 +1300 - Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > emerge mail-filter/qmail-scanner
> You will have to talk to them I'm afraid. As they have "packaged" Q-S,
> and apparently it isn't the same as the "real" Q-S - you will need to
> talk to them as to what is wrong.
hat SA does indeed scan and tag my messages. Just that QS
somehow want's to screw it over and not understand that it's scored allready
Regards,
Arnvid Karstad
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporti
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:30:11 +0100 - "Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem
Muenchen GmbH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a possibility to have the SpamAssassin headers in every mail
> and not moving the sa headers to something like:
> X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status
I've noticed the
