At 10:14 -0500 19-06-2008, Bookworm wrote:
>Bookworm wrote:
>> Salvatore Toribio wrote:
>>
>>> The only thing that I think could be, is that qmail-inject is sending
>>> to "root" from "root", without a domain part. In this case
>>> qmail-inject should add the content of control/me or
>>> con
Bookworm wrote:
> Salvatore Toribio wrote:
>
>> The only thing that I think could be, is that qmail-inject is sending
>> to "root" from "root", without a domain part. In this case
>> qmail-inject should add the content of control/me or
>> control/defaulthost to the sender and the recipient, a
At 19:57 +0900 19-06-2008, Mike Tedder wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:23:46 +0900, Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>> At 17:39 +0900 19-06-2008, Mike Tedder wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I recently performed an update installation of SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and
>>> qmail-scanner 1.2
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:23:46 +0900, Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 17:39 +0900 19-06-2008, Mike Tedder wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently performed an update installation of SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and
>> qmail-scanner 1.24 to their latest versions -- 3.2.5 and 2.04 --
>> respec
At 17:39 +0900 19-06-2008, Mike Tedder wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I recently performed an update installation of SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and
>qmail-scanner 1.24 to their latest versions -- 3.2.5 and 2.04 --
>respectively. After doing the update, I noticed that for most of my
>mails (not all of them) now hav
Hello all,
I recently performed an update installation of SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and
qmail-scanner 1.24 to their latest versions -- 3.2.5 and 2.04 --
respectively. After doing the update, I noticed that for most of my
mails (not all of them) now have their Message-IDs removed, and
SpamAssassin is tag
