[Qmail-scanner-general]admin notification suppressed when sender is "unreplyable"

2005-06-27 Thread john crawford
Hi. In 1.25, I'm seeing admin not notified of viruses if the sender is unreplyable (addresses matches "owner" for example). I've configured for --notify sender,admin. If sender matches the mailing-list criterion, it also suppresses notification of the admin. &email_sender("admin"); calls s

[Qmail-scanner-general]"qq temporary problem" after online update

2005-06-27 Thread Thomas Booms
Hi all, I'm new to SpamAssassin, qmail-scanner and Clamav. I've successfully installed qmail from lifewithqmail.org, SpamAssassin 3.0.4, qmail-scanner 1.25 and Clamav anti virus on a SuSE 9.0 Professional box. Today I've made an online update whereby I've patched the sudo packet. After this

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Sorin Pop
You're right sorry I was thinking at something else when I wrote the mail :) Thanks for reminding me :)) BTW: Anyway you didn't tell me anything about the Check/Sign ideea. Regards, Sorin On 6/27/05, Dallas L. Engelken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > IMO, Your best best is a patch t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> > > IMO, Your best best is a patch to qmail-remote.c that 'signs' the > > domain key at that point as its leaving your system. > > > Maybe but I want to integrate it in qmail-scanner so I cannot > patch qmail-remote, since qmail-local handles incoming and > outgoing mails > Oh no.. Qmail

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Sorin Pop
On 6/27/05, Sorin Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/27/05, Dallas L. Engelken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >The only problem that I can think of now, is how to > > > determine if mail is delivered local, or it is delivered > > > remote (to sign it or to check it), since --local-doma

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Sorin Pop
On 6/27/05, Dallas L. Engelken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >The only problem that I can think of now, is how to > > determine if mail is delivered local, or it is delivered > > remote (to sign it or to check it), since --local-domains > > isn't good enough. I was thinking of some way to re

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Sorin Pop
On 6/27/05, Adam Goryachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 16:13 +0300, Sorin Pop wrote: > > Hello > > > > I want to know if somebody is interested in helping me make a patch > > for adding DomainKey support to qmail-scanner. I am asking this since > > there is a perl library (Ma

[Qmail-scanner-general]forward spam to one email

2005-06-27 Thread Muhammad Talha
Dear all i am new qmail scanner i have 2 questions . how i can forward all mail tag as spam by spamassassin to one email address ( e.g [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) . how can i implement SPF in qmail scanner . Thanks MT __ Yahoo! Mail Stay connect

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> >The only problem that I can think of now, is how to > determine if mail is delivered local, or it is delivered > remote (to sign it or to check it), since --local-domains > isn't good enough. I was thinking of some way to read the > domains from rcpthosts and know which domains are loca

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 16:13 +0300, Sorin Pop wrote: > Hello > > I want to know if somebody is interested in helping me make a patch > for adding DomainKey support to qmail-scanner. I am asking this since > there is a perl library (Mail::DomainKeys) that for the moment (only) > checks for a valid D

[Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner + domainkeys

2005-06-27 Thread Sorin Pop
Hello I want to know if somebody is interested in helping me make a patch for adding DomainKey support to qmail-scanner. I am asking this since there is a perl library (Mail::DomainKeys) that for the moment (only) checks for a valid DK signature of an incoming mail, but since qmail-scanner can als

[Qmail-scanner-general]f-prot

2005-06-27 Thread Pamcho
I'm using qmail-scanner with f-prot. From few weeks ago I have a problem. I see some f-prot process in memory consuming a lot of CPU: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 30020 qscand25 0 6604 4284 2120 R 39.0 1.7 40:17.09 f-prot 2445 qsc

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]$unzip_options

2005-06-27 Thread Jason Haar
Roman Serbski wrote: Dear colleagues, I noticed that "my $unzip_options=" has been changed to '-Pxx30101xx' in 1.25st (20050406). In 20050207 version it was set '-Pxx56002xx'. Could you please share what it is used for? It is a randomly generated "fake" password passed to unzip to ensure u

[Qmail-scanner-general]$unzip_options

2005-06-27 Thread Roman Serbski
Dear colleagues, I noticed that "my $unzip_options=" has been changed to '-Pxx30101xx' in 1.25st (20050406). In 20050207 version it was set '-Pxx56002xx'. Could you please share what it is used for? Thank you. Roman --- SF.Net email is sponso

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]deferral: Connected_to_64.42.88.20_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4 .2)/

2005-06-27 Thread qmail-scanner
At 06:30 PM 6/26/2005, Jason Haar wrote: What is 64.42.88.20 - is that your Qmail-Scanner server? Or is that reported on your Qmail-Scanner server delivering to someone else? right, sorry i should have made that clear. I'm going to assume it is the Q-S server, in which case what could be happ