Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 0:45 +0900 8-02-2005, David Sperling wrote: You can also run this command to check if SA is working correctly. spamassassin -x --lint I ran the above command but there wasn't any output. I'm hoping that no output is the correct output. scanners="clamdscan_scanner","fast_spamassassin" Yes, th

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread David Sperling
Arnvid Karstad wrote: Gentoo is using the following patch set: http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/download/q-s-1.24st-20041101.patch.gz I've allready opened a bug on their bugzilla after we wrote last. Since I hand patched the 1.24st with the stuff you changed from 1.24 -> 1.25 to se

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread David Sperling
Salvatore Toribio wrote: Hi Gentoo really adds another patch after 1.24st, but I have installed SA-3.0.2 and tested it with 1.24st and 1.25st (I hope it will be in the page today), and I don't get that error. What spamd options are you using? mail-filter/spamassassin Latest version installe

[Qmail-scanner-general]Critical error in qmail-scanner

2005-02-07 Thread Werner Fleck
There is an error in qmail-scanner which I consider critical. I have QS configured to block emails which have executable content attached, e.g. *.exe, *.bat and so on. Unfortunately it is possible for an attacker to bypass this. This happens when the name of the attachment itself is encoded. This h

Re[5]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 12:16 +0100 7-02-2005, Arnvid Karstad wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:10:26 +0100 - Arnvid Karstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > trance spamassassin-3.0.2-r1 # spamc -U /home/spamd/spamd < /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/trance11077625206933448 Hey, but you don't run spamd with unix-socket..

Re[6]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:16:06 +0100 - Arnvid Karstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It came from a line like this > add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_ > auto Even with that fixed.. It has 2 status lines: with qmail-scanner-1.24-mod (clamdscan: 0.81/685.

Re[5]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:10:26 +0100 - Arnvid Karstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > trance spamassassin-3.0.2-r1 # spamc -U /home/spamd/spamd < > /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/trance11077625206933448 > X-Spam-Status: "Yes, score=15.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12, It came from a line

Re[4]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:43:48 +0100 - Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >That's the headers from the mail you just sent (and I'm replying to..) > I don't like that 'X-Spam-Status: "No' header > Notice that in your header there is an extra double quote (") > And the configure script

Re[3]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 11:01 +0100 7-02-2005, Arnvid Karstad wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:50:02 +0100 - Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Gentoo really adds another patch after 1.24st, but I have installed SA-3.0.2 and tested it with 1.24st and 1.25st (I hope it will be in the page today), and I don't ge

Re[3]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:50:02 +0100 - Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gentoo really adds another patch after 1.24st, but I have installed > SA-3.0.2 and tested it with 1.24st and 1.25st (I hope it will be in > the page today), and I don't get that error. Which error are you referin

Re[2]: [Qmail-scanner-general]getting Q-S called from anything other than the test_install

2005-02-07 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 4:09 +0100 7-02-2005, Arnvid Karstad wrote: On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:06:09 +1300 - Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I failed to mention that I'm running gentoo linux. I installed > with the command: > emerge mail-filter/qmail-scanner Oh - I was totally unaware GenToo was pa

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S --log-details syslog not working

2005-02-07 Thread Jason Haar
Ying Meng Tan wrote: Hi, I have tested both Q-S 1.24st and Q-S 1.24 on my SuSE Linux 9.1 box to log Q-S activities to syslog. Though there's no error shown, no activity is logged to the /var/log/messages. Well... does your system log everything to /var/log/messages? I know nothing of how s