> If you can run logwatch on the machine, the latest version has a nice
> output of virii caught... quite informative...
Exactly what I'm planning on doing. :)
Benny
--
"... i want to be a farting burping maniac."
-- "kerry",
C. Bensend wrote:
Yes, you're absolutely right, IF I was doing virus scanning _now_. I'm
not - this is a new server I'm building out to replace the one that's
in production now. Hence, I really have no idea how many the machine
is handling. :)
If you can run logwatch on the machine, the lates
Joe Zacky wrote:
Sam Murez wrote:
Hello--
I was so happy thinking my email setup was so good, and I ran a little
security test, thinking haha, qmail-scanner 1.23st with spamassassin and
clamdscan, perlscanner, this stuff stands no chance.
To my horror, all the .bat files went through just fine !
N
> >This is before execution of spam/virusscanners. The message of less than
> >2000 bytes long. Is this simply a slow incoming smtp connection, or is
> >something else wrong?
> >
> Absolutely. In fact, it's been screwing up my stats so much that from
> the next release of Qmail-Scanner, it will de
Tom De Puysseleyr wrote:
Sat, 04 Dec 2004 07:33:57 CET:2231: w_c: start dumping incoming msg into
/var/spool/qmailscan/working/tmp/VMVMA211021420374872231 [0.001003]
Sat, 04 Dec 2004 07:34:01 CET:2231: c_a_g: found MIME attachment
This is before execution of spam/virusscanners. The message of less
