> >This is before execution of spam/virusscanners. The message of less than > >2000 bytes long. Is this simply a slow incoming smtp connection, or is > >something else wrong? > > > Absolutely. In fact, it's been screwing up my stats so much that from > the next release of Qmail-Scanner, it will deliberately reset its > counter to zero AFTER the data has been received from qmail-smtpd. > Before I was seeing some e-mails taking 200 minutes to process - when in > fact it was a dodgy switch in front of the server severely slowing down > throughput. The message would basically take 200 min to be delivered to > disk, and then Q-S would take 3 sec to process - but stamp the syslog > record as saying the message took 12003 sec "to process". Ewww.
Okay, that's the answer I was hoping to get. My boss keeps asking me why it takes so long for mails to be scanned, so now I can tell him how it really goes :-) Looking forward to the new version! Tom. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
