Tom De Puysseleyr wrote:
Absolutely. In fact, it's been screwing up my stats so much that from the next release of Qmail-Scanner, it will deliberately reset its counter to zero AFTER the data has been received from qmail-smtpd. Before I was seeing some e-mails taking 200 minutes to process - when in fact it was a dodgy switch in front of the server severely slowing down throughput. The message would basically take 200 min to be delivered to disk, and then Q-S would take 3 sec to process - but stamp the syslog record as saying the message took 12003 sec "to process". Ewww.Sat, 04 Dec 2004 07:33:57 CET:2231: w_c: start dumping incoming msg into /var/spool/qmailscan/working/tmp/VMVMA211021420374872231 [0.001003] Sat, 04 Dec 2004 07:34:01 CET:2231: c_a_g: found MIME attachment
This is before execution of spam/virusscanners. The message of less than 2000 bytes long. Is this simply a slow incoming smtp connection, or is something else wrong?
-- Cheers
Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
