Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Re: scanners-per-domain 1.22st

At 16/06/04 20:49 (), Salvatore Toribio wrote: At 15:38 +0530 16-06-2004, Devendra Singh wrote: At 03/06/04 22:21 (), Salvatore Toribio wrote: q-s-1.22st-20040602 scanners_per_domain, this options allows to define a per user/domain scan

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Notify recips not working ??

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 06:43:26PM +0200, Brian Ipsen wrote: > Hi, > > For test purposes I've enabled notifications for recipients as well, using: > > #Addresses that should be alerted of any quarantined Email > my $NOTIFY_ADDRS='sender,recips,nmlvadm'; > > The scanner catches the eicar signatu

[Qmail-scanner-general]Notify recips not working ??

Hi, For test purposes I've enabled notifications for recipients as well, using: #Addresses that should be alerted of any quarantined Email my $NOTIFY_ADDRS='sender,recips,nmlvadm'; The scanner catches the eicar signature, I try to send through the system but the recipient is never notified

[Qmail-scanner-general]Re: scanners-per-domain 1.22st

At 15:38 +0530 16-06-2004, Devendra Singh wrote: At 03/06/04 22:21 (), Salvatore Toribio wrote: q-s-1.22st-20040602 scanners_per_domain, this options allows to define a per user/domain scanners_array, see the file scanners_per_domain.tx

[Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner+spamassassin+sa-learn correct usage question

Hi, I'm running qmail-scanner with spamassassin for a site-wide scanning. I'd like to know what would be the proper way to setup and use Spamassassin + Bayes db + sa-learn: 1. setup a bayes_path in local.cf and point my sa-learn to the correct location. Can I run sa-learn as any user and just make

[Qmail-scanner-general]Re: scanners-per-domain 1.22st

At 03/06/04 22:21 (), Salvatore Toribio wrote: Hi There is a new version of the "st patch", at this time I don't have too much time to write some docs about the new feature scanners-per-domain, I think you all are enough smart to find the way by yourselves. Let me know if something doesn't work

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Blank message problem, broken message id

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:18:55AM +0100, Alastair Battrick wrote: > Well originally I assumed they were just incorrectly formatted spam emails > also, but when I examined some, they were not being flagged as such, with > a SA score of 1 or 2. :-) I'm sorry - they only score 1 or 2 "so they're not

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Blank message problem, broken message id

Jason Haar said: > Well yeah - it's not being delivered properly - or it's not being created > properly. These messages look like SPAM to me - so how do you know this > "fault" isn't with the Spammer's SMTP client? Why do you think it's > anything to do with Qmail-Scanner? Well originally I assume

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Blank message problem, broken message id

>> Well, it's not a bug with Q-S - in fact it's a bug with either your >> POP/IMAP servers and/or clients for groaning at a poorly written >> Message-ID header... > > I find this hard to believe. IMHO the message is not delivered properly, > the file that holds the message on the server is truncate

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Blank message problem, broken message id

Additionally, attached is the full debug log for the message that is below, if that is any help Al Alastair Battrick said: >> Well, it's not a bug with Q-S - in fact it's a bug with either your >> POP/IMAP servers and/or clients for groaning at a poorly written >> Message-ID header... > > I find

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Blank message problem, broken message id

> Well, it's not a bug with Q-S - in fact it's a bug with either your > POP/IMAP servers and/or clients for groaning at a poorly written > Message-ID header... I find this hard to believe. IMHO the message is not delivered properly, the file that holds the message on the server is truncated as in