hi guys,
i'm trying to install qmail-scanner on my debian box. i ran configure w/
my options, however, i got this output:
Searching...
** FATAL ERROR ***
/usr/bin/reformime contains bugs. Please upgrade to a release
that post-dates Mar 22 2002 (e.g. 1.3.8)
i'm using v1.38 of reformime, though...
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 07:12:41PM -0400, Linux Newbie wrote:
> Hello all.
> I am attempting to install qmail-scanner on red hat linux 8I previously
> installed Qmail-toaster, vpopmail toaster, and clamav successfully.
> Whether I use
>
> I still get the following error:
>
> Unmatched righ
Linux Newbie wrote:
Hello all.
I am attempting to install qmail-scanner on red hat linux 8I
previously installed Qmail-toaster, vpopmail toaster, and clamav
successfully. Whether I use
./configure --scanners "clamscan" --admin "me" --domain "mydomain"
--debug
or
./configure --scanners "c
Hello all.
I am attempting to install qmail-scanner on red hat linux 8I previously
installed Qmail-toaster, vpopmail toaster, and clamav successfully. Whether
I use
./configure --scanners "clamscan" --admin "me" --domain "mydomain" --debug
or
./configure --scanners "clamscan" --admin "me"
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:23:08PM -0700, Justyn Kemple wrote:
> Yes thats the weird thing about it. I get the spam that the test script
> sends through. But the 2 Virii email I dont go...nor do I get notification
> about it.
Ah - so you do get emailed then.
Look at your configuration:
> ./conf
I was using ClamAV.70 with qmail-scanner1.20 and it worked fine. I got all my message notification of viruses it snagged. However when I upgraded to 1.21 in qmail-scanner it stopped sending me emails. So I upgraded clamAV to .71 and it still wouldnt work. so I upgraded qmail-scanner to 1.22 and tha
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 07:44:58AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
> i have also seen definition files cause severe slowdowns in a/v scanners, and
> soon as they were replaced, the problem went away.
Indeed - this is a serious issue for some AVs.
Some AVs never clean up after themselves. So over time you en
Ah, then the configuration problem is with the antivirus section. Do
you have it set to not notify you, and delete? have you checked the
quarantine folder to see if they're at least getting dropped into there?
BW
Justyn Kemple wrote:
Yes thats the weird thing about it. I get the spam that the
Yes thats the weird thing about it. I get the spam that the test script sends through. But the 2 Virii email I dont go...nor do I get notification about it.Bookworm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Something like this, correct?./configure --admin postmaster --domain yourdomain.com --notify admin --loc
Justyn Kemple wrote:
OK I have tried this in both 1.21 and 1.22. When ever I tell ./configure --notify
admin when I install it I get no errors. However when I run
/contrib/test_installation.sh -doit I dont get any messages about the virii that got
sent. Am I missing something?
---
OK I have tried this in both 1.21 and 1.22. When ever I tell ./configure --notify admin when I install it I get no errors. However when I run /contrib/test_installation.sh -doit I dont get any messages about the virii that got sent. Am I missing something?
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Domains - Claim you
I noticed that qmail-scanner 1.22 uses "perl" and my
previous qmail-scanner 1.16 uses "suidper"
Any difference?
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu May 20 2004 03:59 am, root linux wrote:
>
> although the time in process says no, it could very
> well be. we explore
Ok, I upgraded the qmail-scanner from 1.16 to 1.22 and
monitor it first before I turn off the antivirus...
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu May 20 2004 03:59 am, root linux wrote:
>
> although the time in process says no, it could very
> well be. we explored many
LOL... Personally, I don't really care, I just thought it was
funny/brave to post that ..like, hello??!!...
(Well, unless it was on my network, of course! ;-)
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
I thought I saw that. Should we send this to Mr. Gates and his Money
grubbing band wagon?
-Original Message-
I thought I saw that. Should we send this to Mr. Gates and his Money
grubbing band wagon?
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Insufficient memory
hmm... a 'warez'ed
At 07:00 AM 5/20/2004, Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
it's
email not FTP.
Don't scan file over 10MB
opinions are nice. everyone has one. of course, your opinion is
irrelevant to the question posed, and thus is not helpful.
chances are, he needs to increase his softlimits to accomodate the large
messag
hmm... a 'warez'ed' copy of retina, eh? LOL... :-p
>>Scanning file
>>
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/work.tj.pr.gov.br10850591204659195/Retina.zip/KEYGEN.EX_
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
it's email not FTP.
Don't scan file over 10MB
-Original Message-
From: Fabiano F. Vitale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Title: Message
it's
email not FTP.
Don't
scan file over 10MB
-Original Message-From: Fabiano F. Vitale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:38
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[Qmail-scanner-general]Insufficient memory
Hello,
My email server is using qmail-scan
Hello,
My email server is using qmail-scanner and uvscan.
When I try to send
a email with 20mb zip file a log on
qmail-queue.log is generated and
the email is not sent. The log generated in
qmail-queue.log was:
Thu, 20 May 2004 10:18:40 -0300:9195: run
/usr/local/bin/uvscan -v -r --s
Sorry, you're right about the 'make test', it was a ./configure without the --install
option.
I did not try it to see if it would work but I saw in the archives people having
problems running and scanner not working because of this error. I'm trying to install
Perl 5.8.4 and I'll see how it go
On Thu May 20 2004 07:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
afraid that is one that we have not tried. we currently use, and are happy
with, the commandsoftware csav scanner for linux. excellent product.
> Anybody ever use qmail-scaqnner with Symantec Command Line Scanner?
>
> Regard,
> Akef
>
>
> ---
On Thu May 20 2004 03:59 am, root linux wrote:
although the time in process says no, it could very well be. we explored many
packages both free and commercial trial versions until we found one fast
enough to fit our needs. most were intolerably slow. by that i mean they took
only a few seconds
Anybody ever use qmail-scaqnner with Symantec Command Line Scanner?
Regard,
Akef
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll
Could it be the antivirus processing problem? I am
using Virus Scan for Linux v4.24.0
Regards,
rootlinux
--- Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed May 19 2004 12:46 pm, root linux wrote:
> hmm.. if it is any consolation, and i dont know if
> anyone else experienced
> this, but our incoming
24 matches
Mail list logo
