RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread qmail-scanner
At 01:23 PM 4/2/2004, CertaintyTech-Ed wrote: Are both scanning the message with SpamAssassin? Remember that local messages (where RELAYCLIENT is set) do not get scanned by SA and therefore go thru much quicker. Could that be it? On my system its about 10 times faster if not scanned by SA. no, t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread CertaintyTech-Ed
> > here's some of the 'all finished' lines from one of my > existing proxies - > obviously solaris, as you can see from the '%z' on each line ;^) > > > > side by side, there's not a huge difference i suppose. but > again - i would > have expected the new server to be much, much faster with

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread qmail-scanner
here's some of the 'all finished' lines from one of my existing proxies - obviously solaris, as you can see from the '%z' on each line ;^) Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:27:31 %z:6249: --- all finished. Total of 16.853178 secs Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:27:32 %z:6218: --- all finished. Total of 20.053003 secs Fri,

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread CertaintyTech-Ed
> >Looks like most of the scanning time takes place when removing file. > >*OR* the date/time is not getting updated until the last > line is written > >so it misleads you to think that a large time jump happens > at the end. > >This is what I bet it is... > > i wish that were the case. the mes

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread qmail-scanner
At 11:40 AM 4/2/2004, CertaintyTech-Ed wrote: > Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: e_v_r: > email_quarantine_report took > 0.052252 seconds to execute > Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf > /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/pravda.smileglobal.com108092703357446026/ > /var/spool/

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread CertaintyTech-Ed
> Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: e_v_r: > email_quarantine_report took > 0.052252 seconds to execute > Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:30:33 -0800:46026: cleanup: /bin/rm -rf > /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/pravda.smileglobal.com108092703357446026/ > /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/pravda.smileglobal.c

[Qmail-scanner-general]Date/TZ format in Solaris 8

2004-04-02 Thread CertaintyTech-Ed
Jason, I recently noticed that the date format that Q-S uses does not display the timezone with my server. Here is an example from the qmail-scanner-queue.pl: # Format: day, dd month hh:mm:ss +TZ... my $nowtime = strftime("%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S %z", localtime(time)); My system does not re

[Qmail-scanner-general]strange delay at end of scan

2004-04-02 Thread qmail-scanner
got a weird problem (i would have checked the archives, but i'm getting an error at sourceforge when i try). i'm preparing a new proxy spam/virus scanner. admittedly, this is my first FreeBSD box - i've been solaris up until now. but i don't think this is OS related. i'll say up front as well

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]remove attachment from message

2004-04-02 Thread Alex Pleiner
* Smeagol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 08:24]: > Hai, > I'm trying to patch my qmail with this patch, but i got this : > qmail-1.03]# patch patching file case_startb.c > patching file Makefile > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Is this normal ? No. Did you

[Qmail-scanner-general]silent_viruses_array

2004-04-02 Thread Muhamad Soleh Fajari
Hi .. Im using qmail-scanner-1.20 on solaris I want my qmail-scanner not give warning if there is virus worm.somefool or netsky , so I set it in "@silent_viruses_array", I was give "netsky" and "Worm.SomeFool.Q" . But qmail-scanner still give warning... what should I do to make it work ? -