Re: [QGIS-Developer] Nomination for Benoit de Mezzo and Jean Felder as QGIS core committers

2025-02-09 Thread Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-Developer
+1, well deserved! Kind regards. On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 3:05 PM Even Rouault via QGIS-Developer < qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Hi PSC, > > I'd like to propose that Benoit de Mezzo > (https://github.com/benoitdm-oslandia) and Jean Felder > (https://github.com/ptitjano) are granted c

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Urgent review of github rules and policies required! (was: Nomination for Benoit de Mezzo and Jean Felder as QGIS core committers)

2025-02-09 Thread Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 17:00, Loic Bartoletti wrote: > As you point out, it's important to note that activity is not solely measured > by direct commits, but encompasses all significant contributions to the > project (code reviews, participation in technical discussions, etc.). Actually, I **w

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Urgent review of github rules and policies required!

2025-02-09 Thread Julien Cabieces via QGIS-Developer
Hi, I agree that we need a formal proposal for all the points that you rise, and I agree also with what you propose. Regarding Andrea's nomination, We were 6 to agree on giving him the committer's right [0] and no one said no, so I don't see any reason not to proceed with its nomination. Regard

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Urgent review of github rules and policies required!

2025-02-09 Thread Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-Developer
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:51 AM Julien Cabieces via QGIS-Developer < qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree that we need a formal proposal for all the points that you rise, > and I agree also with what you propose. > > Regarding Andrea's nomination, We were 6 to agree on giving

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Urgent review of github rules and policies required! (was: Nomination for Benoit de Mezzo and Jean Felder as QGIS core committers)

2025-02-09 Thread Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 21:28, Saber Razmjooei via QGIS-PSC < qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Nothing against this nomination but I remember the discussion for becoming a core contributor was raised before with the PSC and it was agreed the current method is not ideal and should be revie

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Nomination for Benoit de Mezzo and Jean Felder as QGIS core committers

2025-02-09 Thread Matthias Kuhn via QGIS-Developer
Hi I second the nominations for both, Jean and Benoit. They are active for a long time, provide high quality code and are able to work in a team. They also didn't just provide code but also participate by giving feedback. Best regards Matthias On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 13:49 Even Rouault via QGIS-Dev

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Nomination for Benoit de Mezzo and Jean Felder as QGIS core committers

2025-02-09 Thread Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 06:09, Matthias Kuhn via QGIS-PSC wrote: > > Hi > > I second the nominations for both, Jean and Benoit. > They are active for a long time, provide high quality code and are able to > work in a team. They also didn't just provide code but also participate by > giving feedba

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Urgent review of github rules and policies required! (was: Nomination for Benoit de Mezzo and Jean Felder as QGIS core committers)

2025-02-09 Thread Loic Bartoletti via QGIS-Developer
Hi, Thank you Nyall for raising this topic again regarding the management of commit rights in QGIS. I fully support this proposal, which I find particularly relevant for the security and sustainability of the project. Having observed similar policies in other major open source projects, the 12-

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Urgent review of github rules and policies required!

2025-02-09 Thread Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, 5:56 pm Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-PSC, < qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:51 AM Julien Cabieces via QGIS-Developer < > qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree that we need a formal proposal for all the points that you ri