On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 06:09, Matthias Kuhn via QGIS-PSC <qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi > > I second the nominations for both, Jean and Benoit. > They are active for a long time, provide high quality code and are able to > work in a team. They also didn't just provide code but also participate by > giving feedback.
+1, for all the reasons previously listed! We're very lucky to have these two onboard! Nyall > > Best regards > Matthias > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 13:49 Even Rouault via QGIS-Developer > <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: >> >> >> Le 08/02/2025 à 12:28, Saber Razmjooei a écrit : >> > Hi, >> > Nothing against this nomination but I remember the discussion for >> > becoming a core contributor was raised before with the PSC and it was >> > agreed the current method is not ideal and should be reviewed. There >> > was a plan to formalise the process. There were concerns about >> > security, rationale to have write access, number of contributors from >> > an entity... >> >> Seeing the size of the pull request queue that is always on the verge of >> exploding, I believe we need more people who actively use their merge >> rights than the contrary. The below statistics of who merged the last >> 1000 pull requests is pretty telling: >> >> Merges per person: >> nyalldawson: 588 >> m-kuhn: 62 >> troopa81: 59 >> 3nids: 58 >> rouault: 54 >> alexbruy: 45 >> wonder-sk: 41 >> lbartoletti: 27 >> elpaso: 20 >> nirvn: 16 >> uclaros: 13 >> jef-n: 5 >> strk: 4 >> mhugent: 2 >> signedav: 2 >> rldhont: 2 >> tomkralidis: 1 >> PeterPetrik: 1 >> >> I shouldn't speak for Nyall, but if I was in his position, I would feel >> overwhelmed and would enjoy more people helping. This also shows there's >> no obvious Oslandia's uptaking of the project. >> >> If we are really concerned about security reasons and want to keep a ~ >> single person merging into the main repository (but that would be >> officially adopting a benevolent dictatorship model), we need to >> structure the project in a completely different way, for example ala >> Linux kernel, with a repository/tree per "component" (3D, server, >> processing, etc.), with one responsible for each repository, and them >> sending big pull requests to the main integrator. But that would >> certainly complicate and slow down QGIS development (hard to tell if it >> would be a good or bad thing). QGIS is probably in an intermediate >> position between the typical small/medium github project and the huge >> project like the Linux kernel. >> >> Even >> >> -- >> http://www.spatialys.com >> My software is free, but my time generally not. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-PSC mailing list > qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
