Hi I second the nominations for both, Jean and Benoit. They are active for a long time, provide high quality code and are able to work in a team. They also didn't just provide code but also participate by giving feedback.
Best regards Matthias On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 13:49 Even Rouault via QGIS-Developer < qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Le 08/02/2025 à 12:28, Saber Razmjooei a écrit : > > Hi, > > Nothing against this nomination but I remember the discussion for > > becoming a core contributor was raised before with the PSC and it was > > agreed the current method is not ideal and should be reviewed. There > > was a plan to formalise the process. There were concerns about > > security, rationale to have write access, number of contributors from > > an entity... > > Seeing the size of the pull request queue that is always on the verge of > exploding, I believe we need more people who actively use their merge > rights than the contrary. The below statistics of who merged the last > 1000 pull requests is pretty telling: > > Merges per person: > nyalldawson: 588 > m-kuhn: 62 > troopa81: 59 > 3nids: 58 > rouault: 54 > alexbruy: 45 > wonder-sk: 41 > lbartoletti: 27 > elpaso: 20 > nirvn: 16 > uclaros: 13 > jef-n: 5 > strk: 4 > mhugent: 2 > signedav: 2 > rldhont: 2 > tomkralidis: 1 > PeterPetrik: 1 > > I shouldn't speak for Nyall, but if I was in his position, I would feel > overwhelmed and would enjoy more people helping. This also shows there's > no obvious Oslandia's uptaking of the project. > > If we are really concerned about security reasons and want to keep a ~ > single person merging into the main repository (but that would be > officially adopting a benevolent dictatorship model), we need to > structure the project in a completely different way, for example ala > Linux kernel, with a repository/tree per "component" (3D, server, > processing, etc.), with one responsible for each repository, and them > sending big pull requests to the main integrator. But that would > certainly complicate and slow down QGIS development (hard to tell if it > would be a good or bad thing). QGIS is probably in an intermediate > position between the typical small/medium github project and the huge > project like the Linux kernel. > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
