On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:31:54PM +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> My point is the following: today 2 qemu guests with dedicated
> macaddr cannot share the same TAP-win32 v8 adapter.
>
> The software I mentionned above doesn't have similar limitation.
> Would it be feasible to change the current
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 05:00:42PM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have some problems using the built-in DHCP server in qemu.
>
> 1. Is it possible to have guets connected?
> If I launch 3 qemu, that I can do:
> ping 10.2.0.15
> ping 10.2.0.14
> and so on.
> In order to simulate a netw
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:50:47AM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> >No. In fact, the server is set up to always return the same IP in response
> >to
> >a request.
> err.. it works for me...
Yes, it seems that Fabrice has slipped in a few changes since I last looked at
the slirp code. :) The interna
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:17:04AM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> > I don't see any way for qemu guests to be able to
> > ping each other
> > (for example) if they are both using user-net.
> >
> it would be good to get that working :)
>
Alas, that is so difficult it is nearly impossible.
> if to
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:02PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2005 16:59, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I understand that the current "official" qemu needs gcc 3.x and won't
> > compile with gcc 4.x
>
> You can compile qemu and the kernel module with dif
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:54:48PM -0400, Matt Young wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When I boot the install cd in
> qemu it probes the printer parallel port for a hardware plug that has the OS
> key
> on it.
> some reason, even tho I have the plug inserted in the p
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:28:53AM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> Nearly? Oh come on... you know it ain't possible, period.
>
What are you refering to? The ability of a single qemu to ping thru slirp,
or the ability of multiple qemus to ping each other using their guest ips?
The former can be
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:13:21PM -0700, Don Kitchen wrote:
> I've used that one "pricey" product at work, but it always seemed a bit
> expensive for home users. But I only knew about some of the other emulators,
> the ones that are so slow you wonder why didn't they warn you not to
> bother downl
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:12:41AM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Jim C. Brown a ?crit :
>
> >Typically, tapX (tap0, tap1, etc) names are reserved for tap devices
> >(ethernet
> >frames) and tunX (tun0, tun1, etc) are reserved for tun devices (IP
> >fra
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> That means it would work if the host NIC is connected to a switch? Then
> the switch would send packets from the guest which are meant for the
> host back to the host NIC and everything's fine! Or did I misunderstand
> that now?
>
>
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:24:03PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >And qemu already supports that, via the -tun-fd option.
>
> Can you please give me an exemple how to use the -tun-fd option to open
> an existing tun (i.e: tun-alice) ? This option only work for already
> opened tap/tun
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2005 14:07, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> > > That means it would work if the host NIC is connected to a switch? Then
> > > th
at 04:51:41PM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> En r?ponse ? "Jim C. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > > if tomsrtbt is the only guest : no IP given
> > > if tomsrtbt is launch with -macaddr xx : no IP given
> > > if tomsrtbt is launch after another guest : n
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 04:39:59AM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> 1.1.1.1 is not a QEMU given IP.
>
I know. I have no idea why that shows up.
> Try manually assigning the IP 10.0.2.15/24(255.255.255.0) to the quest
> with a default route to 10.0.2.2. This should work.
>
Already did. It does
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:45:16PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I don't understand, why is this patch needed?
>
It makes qemu easier to use.
A lot easier to use a persistent tap by doing "qemu -use-already-open-tap tap1"
instead of hacking around with persistenttapdev.c
> It's a pretty simpl
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:29PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Is there any guideline about the network script ? Or should we add an
> option to let the choice to the user if the network script is called or
> not ?
>
> --
> Jean-Christian de Rivaz
>
If it's persistent, the device
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 10:23:41PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> VDE is a very useful code to complete project like qemu. It requiere
> special code to connect to the vde_switch, but this not a complexe code
> (see how vde_plug make that). Since VDE is higly likly used with qemu, I
> s
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Ok for "-tuntap" long option. Can I propose "-t" for a short option ?
>
Makes sense.
> The idea of the "-vde" option is to have in parameter the VDE socket
> (default to "/tmp/vde.ctl") an act like vde_plug so it don't n
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:07:02PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> Only objection is that for the tunfd case I would use
>
> -net tap,fd=10,macaddr=...
>
Since it doesn't have to be a tap device, how about this?
-net
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:01:08PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>In fact, if qemu supported both these things, then I don't see a reason
> >>for
> >>-tun-fd at all (except for something like VDE).
> >
> >Agree, and a -vde option will go for
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:54:42PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> >What it really boils down to is cleaning up the command line options for
> >the
> >network interface(s), which up to now have been added in a hackish,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 08:29:13PM +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the lack of comment. I mostly use the 'user-net' networking so
> I never bothered much about TUN/TAP.
>
> What I can say is that the '-net xxx' option will be implemented to
> solve the existing issues. My only
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:55:58PM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> And what about a full IP connection beetween hosts? In order to
> simulate a real network to do nfs/smtp/http/smb and so on?
>
> I was thinking of a sort of a net-server which handles the DHCP
> process, the connection for going outs
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:23:26AM +0200, Matteo wrote:
> That would be a very good idea. I've always thought of installing vde or
> any other application to make a network of VMs painfull.
Well, i find that a qemu_switch would be more convient as you could set up
the network at boot time (like i
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> do you happen to have vde for win32 ?
> If yes, please point it to me, because I've googled for one with no
> luck... :)
>
Porting VDE to windows is fairly easy.
The hard part is getting qemu to work with it. Unlike POSIX OSes,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:22:33PM -0500, Brett (Mare) Henley wrote:
> The Longer one goes into greater detail. WaxDragon's first suggestion
> was to use -hdachs to define the drive for the bios. I had to read up
> well to do this but entered 65383,16,63 as my definition and still ended
> up w
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:15:09PM -0500, Brett Henley wrote:
> Alright, but here's the rub. If a drive can be booted by a machine. Why
> can't it boot from Qemu if it's accessing the raw disk via the windows
> interface? This needs no messing with bios or disksize to boot of a
> regular machine
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:01:31AM -0400, Karl Magdsick wrote:
>
> I hope someone else will chime in, but my guess is that the problem
> lies in that an MS Windows "drive" is really a partition, not the entire
> drive. Under Windows you're specifying the equivalent of
> the Linux /dev/hda1 , /dev/
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:25:22AM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> You would install DosEmu into QEMU into Linux or Windows.
> But don't do that, since it makes no sense:
>
Actually, it makes perfect sense if one is talking about user mode qemu
(though that only works on Linux).
>
>
> So, ba
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:14:29PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm trying to get qemu 0.7.2 on Gentoo Linux to work with tun/tap
> network - but fail to do so :/
>
> Thus, network isn't setup properly inside the qemu "guest".
>
> Rather obviously, I seem to be missing something. B
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:11:43PM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> It is off.. that is my issue.. Not quite sure what is going on ..
> Anyway.. the -no-tsc patch works around my issue, but there is still
> something wierd going on with
> my tsc.
>
> Regards,
> Brad
> --
> "Human beings, who are alm
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:16:18PM +0100, Steven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking at qemu, it seems as if it could be possible to allow it to
> run Intel OS X apps on PowerPC OS X, much like a reverse Rosetta. The
> x86 frameworks/libraries are included with Xcode, so possibly
> everything else could
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:29:45PM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> I doubt this is targeted at QEMU,
I agree. It seems it can do 3 things that qemu currently can't: Use certain
types of host hardware (such as DVD or USB), copy & paste between host and
guest, and support drag & drop. None of thes
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:05:08PM -0500, James Lancaster wrote:
> (With or without kqemu)
>
> 1) When switching from qemu, it doesn't like letting go of the mouse. If you
> don't have it grabbed, and click on another window, it will grab the mouse
> again, and the title bar will cycle through
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:08:38AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I downloaded qemu from internet (the .exe binary) and try to run it on
> windows nt. but it fails to start. It just exits silently and nothing
> happens. This is polish version of windows nt workstation with service pack
>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:46:00PM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote:
> as most of you might already be aware, qemu 0.7.2 doesnt compile with
> gcc 4.
>
> is there a patch available?
>
> --
> -- leonard "paniq" ritter
> -- http://www.mjoo.org
> -- http://www.paniq.org
>
Yes, but I caution you
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:29:36PM +1300, Wesley Parish wrote:
> Thanks heaps! It works!
>
> (It should go in the docs, though. Is Fabrice okay with me adding that to
> them? ;)
>
=loadvm is in the man oage. so it's already in the docs.
> Wesley Parish
>
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:50, Johann
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Ricardo Almeida wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since Qemu allows the use of a real cdrom, why doesn't it support the use of
> a real hard drive partition (-hdb /dev/hda1 for instance)?
It does. You have to use -hdb /dev/hda though, since a full MBR and partition
table
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:52:48PM -0700, Scott Dudley wrote:
>
> Can I, in Linux, create a disk image from a mounted Windows disk? This
> would save installation from scratch and migrating all
> software/configuration.
>
> Thanks.
>
It is a bad idea if a filesystem on the disk is mounted, a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:27:19PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > ERROR: QEMU requires SDL or Cocoa for graphical output
> > To build QEMU with graphical output configure with --disable-gfx-check
> > Note that this will disable all output from the virtual graphics card.
>
> Possibly that "with" sho
patch has, but is not complete yet. (Feel free to help
out!)
In any case, most distros allow one to use gcc33 or something to compile
programs. I think a 'make CC=gcc33' would do the trick, if you have that
compiler installed.
> On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 20:50 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 01:05:09AM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 13:10 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > A patch is already available, as noted below.
>
> but where is it? :)
>
If you had bothered to search the archives you could have found it you
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 01:02:08PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mike Swanson schrieb:
> > 4. It sounds reasonable, but it undermines one of QEMU's goals:
> > running guest operating system without modification (and drivers
> > certainly count a
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:58:45AM +, Ricardo Almeida wrote:
> On 10/30/05, Mike Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 3. Perhaps, but there's two things here. First of all, the card would
> > have to be documented in a fair amount of low-level detail, something
> > that big video card
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:01:45AM +, Ricardo Almeida wrote:
> >
> > Fast 3d and emultion does not mix that well.. the more advanced graphics
> > card you try to emulate the more complex (and also slower) the emulation
> > of that graphics card is.
> >
>
> As I said in my previous reply, 3D ca
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:08:19PM -0500, Julien Lancien wrote:
> I saw that there is a binary distribution for linux-i386, however,
> I'ld like to also get kqemu. Is there a way to do that without getting
> gcc 3 ?
>
> Thanks.
>
kqemu is immune to the gcc 3 problem that qemu has. You can use gc
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:11:26AM -0500, Marc Collin wrote:
> Le 2 Novembre 2005 04:15, J??r??me Warnier a ??crit??:
>
> >
> > Could you report on what OS and what architecture you are trying to
> > build it?
> > Further, we could need more information.
>
> ya no problem
>
> i try to build unde
The link for the QEMU Wiki from Morphix Linux doesn't work. It's been down for
half a year I believe. Is someone (I'm guessing Fabrice Bellard himself) going
to fix this?
The page with the broken link: http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/links.html
The link itself: http://am.xs4all.nl/phpwiki/ind
There is another broken link on this page:
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/lists.html
The broken link: http://www.dad-answers.com/qemu-forum/index.php
It should be this: http://qemu.dad-answers.com
Not to be a PITA. I just figure that getting these fixed will leave us with
slightly less conf
KQEMU the GUI was first, kqemu the accelerator stole the name.
KQEMU is called KRDesktop now iirc.
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:03:58AM -0900, Joshua Kugler wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2005 08:52, Antonio Aloisio wrote:
> > Hi all! KQEmu 0.2 pre-alpha is OUT! you can download it from
> > http:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:08:29PM +0100, Marcus Blomenkamp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm having serious problems getting my qemu instance running properly on
> linux
> framebuffer console. Somehow keystrokes are not delivered or translated
Yep. This is a known issue with the framebuffer. For some
I don't know the exact purpose, but they are part of the code that forms the
intermediate language qemu uses when it performs dynamic translating.
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:01:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What is the job of the two files gen-op.h and opc.h? They were created
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:35:12PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> > Thanks - I should have known that someone had made a file system for
> > this. However I still think it would be great to be able to pass the
> > actual /dev/cdrom on to the guest OS, but I must admit that I have not
> > grasped th
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:19:18AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
> facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool
> technogies?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave Feustel
qemu can't use these, since they dont help running
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:57:37PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer, so these extensions don't really
> >help.
> >
> >
> Not quite.
>
> qemu is technically a JIT. kqemu/qvm86 are virtualizers. Bochs is an
> actual emulator.
>
VT/SVM won't help the JIT
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:17:39PM -0700, Phil Rasch wrote:
> I would like to be able to program a hotkey that would allow me to shift from
> a fullscreen qemu session to another workspace or X display with access to
> the host OS. I think I can construct the instructions (to X or gdm/kdm etc)
>
Actually, I think you missed one doc.
http://lilly.csoft.net/~jeffryj/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#head-b566901cb0207e8c085232c84e354cf97684ddc4
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:39:39PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> I have read all the qemu documentation that I have, but I still don't
> un
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:33:55AM +, Julian Seward wrote:
>
> The use of gcc to generate the back end in QEMU's early days was a
> clever way to get the project up and running quickly. But surely
> now it would be better to transition to a handwritten backend, so
> as to be independent futu
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:44:04AM +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >
> > The use of gcc to generate the back end in QEMU's early days was a
> > clever way to get the project up and running quickly. But surely
> > now it would be better to transition to a handwritten backend, so
>
> It should be tr
> - -the software scaler is maybe a good idea, but for fullscreen mode, I'd
> better like to have screen resolution switched to qemu guest resolution
> (as it is with normal qemu now)
The problem is that is really hard to do. Especially in a cross platform
manner.
I couldn't figure out how to sca
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:55:12PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >Fabrice mentioned some time ago that SDL isn't the best choice on
> >Windows because of keyboard issues... Is that still the case?
>
> Probably. I was hoping to punt on the issue of Win32 and instead rely
> on a native Win32 GUI
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:39:01PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jim C. Brown wrote:
>
> >I don't necessarily see a problem with adding support for changing the X
> >server
> >resolution. However, it is probably harder to do right - it is really
> >difficul
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:31:45PM +, Richard Neill wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I hope this isn't a stupid question, but I can't find the answer to it
> anywhere. I have copied across the windows ME partition from an old
> machine, using
> dd if=/dev/hda2 | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] "cat > hda2.img
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:03:26AM -0800, art yerkes wrote:
> > > This is a small patch to enable copying the current console to the
> > > clipboard
> > > with Ctrl+Ins.
> > > A line break is added after the last nonblank character of each copied
> > > line.
> > >
> > > +static void console_copy(
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:40:37PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> Are there any plans to add to qemu the capability to simulate the
> Intel Vanderpool and AMD Pacifica hardware virtualization facilities?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave Feustel
> --
> Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
> NOW with Vi
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:33:06AM +, Mark Jonckheere wrote:
> Richard Neill schreef:
>
> 4)lookup the mailing list archive and find out that this problem
> has already been detected, diagnosed, resolved and completely ignored
> more than a year ago.
>
And sadly, it seems it is being ignored
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:48:57PM +, Richard Neill wrote:
> There's a buglet in qemu in that, if you close the window, it will just
> exit. It would be really useful if it warned you not to do this, but to
> shut down the virtual machine first. Like most applications do to
> prevent datalos
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:46:02AM +0100, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I recently upgraded to Linux 2.6.14 (as compiled as a 686 Debian
> package), and found that this distribution, too, has switched to GCC 4
> for kernel.
>
> I tried to recompile a plain vanilla qemu 0.7.2 tarb
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 08:06:30PM +0100, J?r?me Warnier wrote:
> It would be great if kqemu could be loaded at runtime instead of
> requiring qemu to be rebuild.
This is more or less already the case.
You can compile and distribute a kqemu enabled qemu binary w/o needing to
include kqemu in the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > No, only the .h is needed. The proprietary part is only needed if you
> > want to build the module.
> And the header (.h) is free?
>
That is my understanding.
> --
> J?r?me Warnier
> FLOSS Consultant
> http://beeznest.net
>
-
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:06:06PM -0500, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
> I just tried Minix-3.1.1 install on qemu-7.2 on a
> Linux. I have had no success with getiing ether card
> emulation to work. What are the attributes of this
> device in terms of:
> i/o_address:irq:mem-address
> triple?
>
> Any
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 03:53:56PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> The many display targets sound nice... but what I'd like to have for
> qemu is a GUI...
>
> IIRC the GUI patches which were posted so far replaced the SDL driver by
> rendering to a GTK widget, because the current way for embedding
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:53:20PM -0500, Mick Weiss wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.html#SEC32 does not mention
> that it is possible to correct this by getting SP2. I have not varified
> this myself (I was told this on #qemu on freenode).
>
> If this is
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:11:05PM +, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone implement LBA48 in QEMU please?
>
> Regards,
> Natalia Portillo
Sounds easy enough. Can you send me a spec?
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:39:38PM +, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> www.ansi.org ATA-6, where LBA48 was introduced.
> Costs US$18.00 in PDF.
>
> Regards,
> Natalia Portillo
>
Not good enough.
> El 27/12/2
ther.
> Filip Navara wrote:
>
> >http://www.t13.org/project/d1410r3a.pdf
> >
> >Jim C. Brown wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 11:11:05PM +, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:27:52PM +0100, Flavio Visentin wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> > Config file support without a decent GUI seem rather pointless.
> > The big advantage of doing it as a shell script is it's dead easy to hack
> > to
> > include whatever custom magical features people want.
>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Giuseppe Della Bianca wrote:
> > Yah. I like this the best. It is the most flexible. It even allows
> > you to put logic into your qemu startup.
> ]zac[
>
> The script not are the solution that I would want.
>
> To make a good job with the script is
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:42:27AM +0100, Jernej Simon?i? wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 4, 2006, 22:39:23, Giuseppe Della Bianca wrote:
>
> > Also modifying qemu, the command line of qemu allow to use the logic
> > that everyone prefers.
>
> I'd prefer to have 5 config files and just specify o
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:10:54PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 17:40, Mark Williamson wrote:
> > > - IRQ sharing. Sharing host IRQs between native and virtualized devices
> > > is hard because the host needs to ack the interrupt in the IRQ handler,
> > > but doesn't reall
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:10:36AM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I merged your patches and I made important changes to simplify them. I
> did not do any tests so tell me if you see problems.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fabrice.
>
Have you decided to accept the GPL license on it then?
http://li
This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
VMware...
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
http://jma-box.student.umd.edu:8080/vde-inject/vdeinject.c
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
vde-inject.tbz
Description: Binary data
/* Copyright (C) 2005 Jim Brown
* Copyright (C) 2005 Henrik Nordstrom
*
* This program is free softwar
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:04:35PM -0500, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
> VMware...
>
I should probably add, that this new option (-kernel-kqemu) allows for speeds
very close to VMware because it allows kqemu to virtua
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
/* Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Jim Brown
* Copyright (C) 2005 Henrik Nordstrom
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:09:58AM +0100, Mike Kronenberg wrote:
> Hi malc!
>
> Great!
>
> What I'm looking for now is a windows driver (how obviously :) ).
You'd have to write one yourself. From what malc says, this is fairly simple
though.
> From the source I can't see what device you are a
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:46:07AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I?m sorry, but I?ve been following the CVS commits and I haven?t
> understood this new option (fabrice has not written anything to this
> list about it and what it does for the end user).
>
> Could someone please shed some l
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:29:39PM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
> > VMware...
> >
>
> It hangs my XP host with 100% cpu eaten up, no way to stop qemu,
> o
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:34:10PM +0700, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi Jim
>
> It's me again. here I send you another patch for the vde_pcap_inject.c.
> Nothing fancy here, I only did:
> - move out "open" and "close" from relay() and put them on main()
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:35:48PM +0100, Sven K?hler wrote:
> I have seen thoughts about asynchronous IO for qemu. I thought that they
> would have been integrated along with the DMA-patches already.
>
> I would really see how qemu performs with asynch IO enabled. Are there
> any patches out ther
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:40:58PM +1100, David Burrows wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This particular application, which is used to tune the aftermarket fuel
> injection computer in my car, has a problem when running in native
> DOS mode, where two keypresses are received, instead of just the one that
> w
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:01:00PM -0500, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:40:58PM +1100, David Burrows wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This particular application, which is used to tune the aftermarket fuel
> > injection computer in my car, has a pro
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:03:25AM +0100, Joerg Anders wrote:
> I think a found a workaround for the windows XP problem:
>
That information was already in the Wiki FAQ.
Perhaps we should add a link to it from the main FAQ?
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision beget
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:24:59PM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> On 3/29/06, John Davidorff Pell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > P.S. Why does the list set the reply-to header, isn't that supposed
> > to be a Bad Thing??
>
> Only according to some people :)
> I hate when I reply to a list and the m
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 07:37:50PM +, sofar wrote:
>
> I kind of like it and wish that some lists would allow me to set it as a
> user-preference - there are so many lists and I really never ever want to
> reply to *just* the person (ever, ever, ever).
>
> reply-to the list is good for me
>
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:42:22PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >Updated version, note that this is still not suitable for CVS since
> >x86 fails to build with it.
>
> fyi: for me, arm-softmmu fails as well:
>
By x86, he probably means x86 hosts, not x86-softmmu
All targets
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:23:41AM +0200, Udo 'Robos' Puetz wrote:
> At least this could be used for qemu to import the vmdk images...
> Cheers
> Robos
>
This is already supported, as is creating them and using them directly.
(I was amazed when I first found out as well.)
--
Infinite complexity
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:09:06AM +0200, maestro wrote:
> > This is already supported, as is creating them and using them directly.
> > (I was amazed when I first found out as well.)
> >
> afaik they are only supported when the images consist of only 1 file. at
> least i was not able to run split
having configure check for gcc3, gcc31, gcc32, gcc33, gcc34, etc before checking
for gcc itself might work.
is it really worth the trouble to check every possible combination?
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 02:33:30PM +0200, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> Hi people,
> I have gcc 3.2.3 (run as gcc32) and gcc
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> why would you need to check gcc's version just for displaying help ??
> in fact a bunch of /bin/echo commands...
>
> --- "Jim C. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ?crit :
Not for help. I meant auto
601 - 700 of 728 matches
Mail list logo
