On 08/30/2013 04:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/08/2013 08:15, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
What if you just merge the two series together?
>> It will still be a function which can accept sections bigger than 2^64 and
>> theoretically call int128_get64() and assert. I would think that
Il 30/08/2013 08:15, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> > What if you just merge the two series together?
> It will still be a function which can accept sections bigger than 2^64 and
> theoretically call int128_get64() and assert. I would think that every time
> when anyone calls int128_get64(), t
On 08/29/2013 06:50 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/08/2013 08:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> On 08/29/2013 04:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 29/08/2013 04:26, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Right. I was planning to add my IOMMU stuff right before calculating @end.
>>>
>>>
Il 29/08/2013 08:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> On 08/29/2013 04:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 29/08/2013 04:26, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Right. I was planning to add my IOMMU stuff right before calculating @end.
>>
>> But then the non-IOMMU stuff can just use int128_get
On 08/29/2013 04:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/08/2013 04:26, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>
>> Right. I was planning to add my IOMMU stuff right before calculating @end.
>
> But then the non-IOMMU stuff can just use int128_get64, no? So even if
> this patch simply uses int128_get64, i
Il 29/08/2013 04:26, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>
> Right. I was planning to add my IOMMU stuff right before calculating @end.
But then the non-IOMMU stuff can just use int128_get64, no? So even if
this patch simply uses int128_get64, it is still a suitable basis for
adding IOMMU stuff.
P
On 08/29/2013 11:42 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:03 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 08/29/2013 01:18 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:29 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Upcoming VFIO on SPAPR PPC64 support will initialize the IOMMU
>>
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:03 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 01:18 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:29 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> Upcoming VFIO on SPAPR PPC64 support will initialize the IOMMU
> >> memory region with UINT64_MAX (2^64 bytes) size
On 08/29/2013 01:18 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:29 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Upcoming VFIO on SPAPR PPC64 support will initialize the IOMMU
>> memory region with UINT64_MAX (2^64 bytes) size so int128_get64()
>> will assert.
>>
>> The patch takes care of this c
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:29 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Upcoming VFIO on SPAPR PPC64 support will initialize the IOMMU
> memory region with UINT64_MAX (2^64 bytes) size so int128_get64()
> will assert.
>
> The patch takes care of this check. The existing type1 IOMMU code
> is not expected
10 matches
Mail list logo
