Il 29/08/2013 08:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: > On 08/29/2013 04:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 29/08/2013 04:26, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> >>> Right. I was planning to add my IOMMU stuff right before calculating @end. >> >> But then the non-IOMMU stuff can just use int128_get64, no? So even if >> this patch simply uses int128_get64, it is still a suitable basis for >> adding IOMMU stuff. > > Suitable but ugly. What if before calling int128_get64, I test > section->size if it is <2^64 and only then do RAM part of this function?
What if you just merge the two series together? Paolo
