On 2/10/25 15:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:14, Peter Xu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 06:18:50PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 17:48, Peter Xu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
(I wonder if we ought to suggest
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Peter,
Eric,
>
>
> On 2/7/25 6:47 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstanding
> >> DMA in the enter phase? But it's probably ea
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 14:14, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 06:18:50PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 17:48, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstandi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 06:18:50PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 17:48, Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstanding
> > > DMA in the enter phase? But it's probably easier t
Hi Peter,
On 2/7/25 7:18 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 17:48, Peter Xu wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstanding
>>> DMA in the enter phase? But it's probably easier to fix
>>> the iommu
Hi Peter,
On 2/7/25 5:58 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 16:50, Eric Auger wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/7/25 5:37 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 14:23, Eric Auger wrote:
Currently the iommu may be reset before the devices
it protects. For example this
Hi Peter,
On 2/7/25 6:47 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstanding
>> DMA in the enter phase? But it's probably easier to fix
>> the iommus like this series does than try to get every
>> dma-capab
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 17:48, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstanding
> > DMA in the enter phase? But it's probably easier to fix
> > the iommus like this series does than try to get every
> > dma-
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> (I wonder if we ought to suggest quiescing outstanding
> DMA in the enter phase? But it's probably easier to fix
> the iommus like this series does than try to get every
> dma-capable pci device to do something different.)
I wonder i
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 16:50, Eric Auger wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 2/7/25 5:37 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 14:23, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> Currently the iommu may be reset before the devices
> >> it protects. For example this happens with virtio-scsi-pci.
> >> when system_reset is i
On 2/7/25 5:37 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 14:23, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Currently the iommu may be reset before the devices
>> it protects. For example this happens with virtio-scsi-pci.
>> when system_reset is issued from qmp monitor, spurious
>> "virtio: zero sized buffer
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 14:23, Eric Auger wrote:
>
> Currently the iommu may be reset before the devices
> it protects. For example this happens with virtio-scsi-pci.
> when system_reset is issued from qmp monitor, spurious
> "virtio: zero sized buffers are not allowed" warnings can
> be observed.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
