Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

Ekaterina Tumanova writes: > On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: >>> On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: 3. Why does s390 need

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

On 11/28/2014 01:35 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: 3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()? Since h

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

Ekaterina Tumanova writes: > On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: [...] >> 3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()? >> > Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of x86-specific LBA > translation, we have to modify it not to get in the way of z > architecture I already

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > >4. Please use scripts/checkpatch.pl to check coding style. > > > I did :) You are right, checkpatch.pl does

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > >3. Why does s390 need to customize hd_geometry_guess()? > > > Since hd_geometry_guess contains semantics of

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread. Thi

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. > So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to > this thread. > > This is the rework of the geometry+bloc

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

Am 19.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova: > Hi folks, > > I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. > So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to > this thread. > > This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, whic

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

Am 19.11.2014 um 11:17 schrieb Ekaterina Tumanova: > Hi folks, > > I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. > So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to > this thread. > > This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, whic

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices

Hi folks, I'm sorry for the recent spam. I messed up during code submission last time. So please ignore any previous notes you received from me and answer only to this thread. This is the rework of the geometry+blocksize patch, which was recently discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/