HI Peter,
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 19:20, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> > Is 0.001 uT OK to use as a starting point? I think that's enough for most
> > sensors I'm aware of.
>
> The thing is that the starting point is also the finishing point:
> once we have released something that uses a particular set
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 17:49, Kevin Townsend wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 17:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> That's OK -- our "int" properties are int64_t. So we could easily
>> fit something like 1 == 1. uT, in case we might want
>> the extra precision in future. That would be 1,00
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 17:14, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> That's OK -- our "int" properties are int64_t. So we could easily
> fit something like 1 == 1. uT, in case we might want
> the extra precision in future. That would be 1,000,000 == 1 G
> (assuming I haven't messed up my arithmetic ;-))
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 15:22, Kevin Townsend wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 15:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> >> Why "lsb" ?
>> >>
>> >
>> > In my head, using LSB seemed more precise since I know exactly what value
>> > will
>> > be set to the registers, and exactly what I will get back when
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 15:52, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> >> Why "lsb" ?
> >>
> >
> > In my head, using LSB seemed more precise since I know exactly what
> value will
> > be set to the registers, and exactly what I will get back when reading
> versus passing
> > in a float that's needs to be conveted
On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 14:38, Kevin Townsend wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for the review, and sorry for the slow reply, just getting back from
> holidays myself.
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 17:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>
>> So if I'm reading the datasheet correctly, the LM303DLHC is
>> rea
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the review, and sorry for the slow reply, just getting back from
holidays myself.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 17:39, Peter Maydell
wrote:
>
> So if I'm reading the datasheet correctly, the LM303DLHC is
> really two completely distinct i2c devices in a single
> package with diffe
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 17:31, Kevin Townsend wrote:
>
> This commit adds emulation of the magnetometer on the LSM303DLHC.
> It allows the magnetometer's X, Y and Z outputs to be set via the
> mag_x, mag_y and mag_z properties, as well as the 12-bit
> temperature output via the temperature property
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 17:31, Kevin Townsend wrote:
>
> This commit adds emulation of the magnetometer on the LSM303DLHC.
> It allows the magnetometer's X, Y and Z outputs to be set via the
> mag_x, mag_y and mag_z properties, as well as the 12-bit
> temperature output via the temperature property
This commit adds emulation of the magnetometer on the LSM303DLHC.
It allows the magnetometer's X, Y and Z outputs to be set via the
mag_x, mag_y and mag_z properties, as well as the 12-bit
temperature output via the temperature property.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Townsend
---
hw/sensor/Kconfig
10 matches
Mail list logo
