On 10/28/24 01:41, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Sun, 2024-10-27 at 20:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/27/24 15:26, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/27/24 23:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:13, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goate
On Sun, 2024-10-27 at 20:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/27/24 15:26, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 10/27/24 23:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/27/24 14:13, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > > On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >
On 10/27/24 15:26, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/27/24 23:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:13, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't mind a single file. What bothers me is that the partitioning is mad
On 10/27/24 23:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:13, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't mind a single file. What bothers me is that the partitioning is made
mandatory for ast2600 even if not used.
On 10/27/24 14:13, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't mind a single file. What bothers me is that the partitioning is made
mandatory for ast2600 even if not used.
Our only use case, in 2019, was to boot Q
On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't mind a single file. What bothers me is that the partitioning is made
mandatory for ast2600 even if not used.
Our only use case, in 2019, was to boot QEMU ast2600 machines from an
eMMC device usi
On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't mind a single file. What bothers me is that the partitioning is made
mandatory for ast2600 even if not used.
Our only use case, in 2019, was to boot QEMU ast2600 machines from an
eMMC device using an OpenBMC FW image like the ones we f
On 10/26/24 07:54, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/25/24 21:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 25/10/24 12:25, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 06:59 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/25/24 02:57, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/24/24 19:5
On 10/25/24 21:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 25/10/24 12:25, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 06:59 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/25/24 02:57, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Cc'ing
On 25/10/24 12:25, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 06:59 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/25/24 02:57, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Cc'ing Jan.
On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
I
On 10/25/24 08:25, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 06:59 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/25/24 02:57, Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Cc'ing Jan.
On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
I
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 06:59 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/25/24 02:57, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > > Cc'ing Jan.
> > > >
> > > > On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > >
>
On 10/25/24 02:57, Jan Lübbe wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Cc'ing Jan.
On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/21/24 21:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter Ro
Hi,
On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 08:55 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Cc'ing Jan.
> >
> > On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/21/24 21:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > > Hi Guenter,
> > > >
> > > > On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter
On 10/24/24 19:59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Cc'ing Jan.
On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/21/24 21:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Unrelated to this, but I found that the sd emulation in 9.1 is also broken
for loongarch
Cc'ing Jan.
On 22/10/24 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/21/24 21:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Unrelated to this, but I found that the sd emulation in 9.1 is also
broken
for loongarch and sifive_u, and partially for ast2600-evb (it h
On 10/21/24 21:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Unrelated to this, but I found that the sd emulation in 9.1 is also broken
for loongarch and sifive_u, and partially for ast2600-evb (it has two
controllers, with one of them no longer working)
On 10/21/24 21:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Unrelated to this, but I found that the sd emulation in 9.1 is also broken
for loongarch and sifive_u, and partially for ast2600-evb (it has two
controllers, with one of them no longer working)
Hi Guenter,
On 21/10/24 11:02, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Unrelated to this, but I found that the sd emulation in 9.1 is also broken
for loongarch and sifive_u, and partially for ast2600-evb (it has two
controllers, with one of them no longer working). That is too much for me
to track down quickly, s
On 10/21/24 02:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 09:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 21/10/2024 09.15, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 17/10/2024 18.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived th
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 09:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 21/10/2024 09.15, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 17/10/2024 18.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
> >> boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived the
> >> culling of the OMAP/P
On 21/10/2024 11.17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 09:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 21/10/2024 09.15, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 17/10/2024 18.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived
On 21/10/2024 09.15, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 17/10/2024 18.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived the
culling of the OMAP/PXA2xx/strongarm machines.
For these tests I'm indebted to Guenter Roe
On 17/10/2024 18.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived the
culling of the OMAP/PXA2xx/strongarm machines.
For these tests I'm indebted to Guenter Roeck, who has kindly
built and made availab
This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived the
culling of the OMAP/PXA2xx/strongarm machines.
For these tests I'm indebted to Guenter Roeck, who has kindly
built and made available the kernel images, rootfs, etc and
docume
25 matches
Mail list logo
