On 21/10/2024 11.17, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 09:01, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 21/10/2024 09.15, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 17/10/2024 18.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
This patchset adds new functional tests for the collie and sx1
boards, which are the only remaining ones that survived the
culling of the OMAP/PXA2xx/strongarm machines.
For these tests I'm indebted to Guenter Roeck, who has kindly
built and made available the kernel images, rootfs, etc and
documented the commands needed to boot them. All I've done
here is wrap those up into test cases in our testcase
framework by cribbing from some of our existing test code.
Based-on: 20241017162755.710698-1-peter.mayd...@linaro.org
("hw/sd/omap_mmc: Don't use sd_cmd_type_t")
-- the sd card test for the sx1 board will not pass without
that bugfix
thanks
-- PMM
Peter Maydell (2):
tests/functional: Add a functional test for the collie board
tests/functional: Add a functional test for the sx1 board
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
tests/functional/meson.build | 3 ++
tests/functional/test_arm_collie.py | 31 +++++++++++++
tests/functional/test_arm_sx1.py | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/functional/test_arm_collie.py
create mode 100755 tests/functional/test_arm_sx1.py
Thanks, I'll queue the patches [...]
Unfortunately, the test_arm_sx1.SX1Test.test_arm_sx1_sd test is not working
for me, it seems to fail the shutdown of the QEMU binary:
The interesting information will be in the guest console
log, which seems to not be in this log. But the first
question is "did you include the omap_mmc fix that the
cover letter and patch description says is a prerequisite"? :-)
Of course I did not. It's Monday morning, apparently I'm still too tired to
read properly ;-) - sorry for that!
/me goes to the kitchen to grab another coffee
Ok, I'll just ignore the patches for my upcoming "test/functional" pull
request, maybe best if you simply merge them via your arm tree instead.
Thomas
