At 05/31/2012 03:23 AM, Luiz Capitulino Wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:50:51 +0800
> Wen Congyang wrote:
>
>> When the guest is panicked, it will write 0x1 to the port 0x505. So if
>> qemu reads 0x1 from this port, we can do the folloing three things
>> according to the parameter -onpanic:
>> 1.
On 06/11/12 16:48, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm thinking about adding a USB hardware proxy that allows communication
> with an external server process which in turn simulates USB devices.
It's already there. Have a look at usbredir.
http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/11006.html
usbredir a
Hi, Avi
Do you have any comment to this patch?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
At 05/21/2012 02:46 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>
> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
> libvirt)
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Lluís Vilanova writes:
>
>> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova
---
monitor.c | 15 ---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 dele
Il 12/06/2012 00:05, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>
> opened = true
> attached = true
>
> This means that the device is in-use by something in QEMU. Requests may
> be in flight as read/write requests are now allowed to be issued.
>
> Most properties cannot be changed in this state (presumably).
> > I don't know why, with kvm it say:
> > KVM not supported for this target
> > No accelerator found!
>
> Unless you're running on ARM with a patched kernel you can't get KVM for
> ARM guests. That's no error.
Linux/ARM starts to support kvm?
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer S
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:44:55AM -0400, Xin Tong wrote:
> In QEMU x86, TB translation flags are set up when the TB is allocated.
> what will happen if the translation flags are modified by one
> instruction in the translation block ? will the translation block be
> terminated right there.
Can
Hey,
I'm thinking about adding a USB hardware proxy that allows communication
with an external server process which in turn simulates USB devices.
I'm new to the internals of QEMU, so what I'm sharing here might already
have been discussed a gazillion times. In that case, just drop me some
pointe
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 03:04 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> That's not quite the way we're modelling it yet as shown by Avi above,
> there is no CPU address space, only a "system" address space.
That can be considered as roughly equivalent for now, though it might
become problematic when modelling
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 20:33 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 06:46 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 17:29 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> When we add a subregion, it always removes the offset from the address
> >> when it
> >> dispatches. This more o
On 06/11/2012 06:46 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 17:29 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
When we add a subregion, it always removes the offset from the address when it
dispatches. This more often than not works out well but for what you're
describing above, it sounds lik
On 06/11/2012 07:29 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 12.06.2012 00:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
I think I'm becoming convinced that realized belongs in DeviceState and
that BlockDriverState does not have a realized equivalent.
To me, realized represents Vcc. When realized=true, the guest has pow
From: Zhi Yong Wu
The -net socket,listen option does not work with the newer -netdev
syntax:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg01508.html
This patch makes it work now.
For the case where one vlan has multiple listenning sockets,
the patch will also provide the support.
S
From: Zhi Yong Wu
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
---
net/socket.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index fcd0a3c..7194345 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -301,7 +301,9 @@ static NetSocketState *net_socket_fd_init
Am 12.06.2012 00:00, schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
>>> system_memory
>>>alias -> pci
>>>alias -> ram
>>> pci
>>>bar1
>>>bar2
>>> pcibm
>>>alias -> pci (prio 1)
>>>alias -> system_memory (prio 0)
>>>
>>> cpu_physical_memory_rw() woul
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:15:55 +0800
> Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>> > This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible q
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> IIRC the word array thing is device specific, not really AXI stream.
> I think the whole connection to AXI is a bit unfortunate,
Yes, so I think we can summaries the confusion here with AXI stream is
completely unreleated to AXI. The connection between the two comes
with the way low le
Am 12.06.2012 00:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> I think I'm becoming convinced that realized belongs in DeviceState and
> that BlockDriverState does not have a realized equivalent.
> To me, realized represents Vcc. When realized=true, the guest has power
> and is active. When realized=false, the
Am 11.06.2012 23:48, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 06/11/2012 04:31 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 11.06.2012 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> On 06/11/2012 03:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.06.2012 19:38, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Am 10.06.2012 17:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder default_x86_64_debian_6_0
while building qemu.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/builders/default_x86_64_debian_6_0/builds/302
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/
Buildslave for this Build: yuzuki
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 17:29 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I don't know that we really have bit masking done right in the memory API.
That's not a big deal:
> When we add a subregion, it always removes the offset from the address when
> it
> dispatches. This more often than not works out wel
On 06/11/2012 05:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
system_memory
alias -> pci
alias -> ram
pci
bar1
bar2
pcibm
alias -> pci (prio 1)
alias -> system_memory (prio 0)
cpu_physical_memory_rw() would be implemented as
memory_
Fixed.
The page at https://sourceforge.net/projects/kvm/files/ now refers to a
modern version. That page now says:
> Looking for the latest version? Download qemu-kvm-1.1-rc4.tar.gz (6.6 MB)
** Changed in: qemu
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Hi,
I wanted to start a central thread as this discussion is spread in two places
right now.
I think I'm becoming convinced that realized belongs in DeviceState and that
BlockDriverState does not have a realized equivalent.
To me, realized represents Vcc. When realized=true, the guest has
> > system_memory
> >alias -> pci
> >alias -> ram
> > pci
> >bar1
> >bar2
> > pcibm
> >alias -> pci (prio 1)
> >alias -> system_memory (prio 0)
> >
> > cpu_physical_memory_rw() would be implemented as
> > memory_region_rw(system_memor
On 06/11/2012 04:31 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 11.06.2012 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 06/11/2012 03:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.06.2012 19:38, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 10.06.2012 17:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 08/06/2012 03:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
+typedef enum Objec
Am 11.06.2012 23:31, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Am 11.06.2012 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On 06/11/2012 03:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 10.06.2012 19:38, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 10.06.2012 17:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 08/06/2012 03:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>>
Am 11.06.2012 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 06/11/2012 03:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 10.06.2012 19:38, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>> Am 10.06.2012 17:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 08/06/2012 03:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>
>> +typedef enum ObjectState {
>> +OBJEC
The following changes since commit 8cc9b43f7c5f826b39af4b012ad89bb55faac29c:
target-microblaze: lwx/swx: first implementation (2012-06-04 10:19:46 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_anthony
for you to fetch changes up t
On 06/11/2012 01:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
property but we're trying to preserve backward compatibility. This
command-line will break:
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -net user,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:15:55 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
> > property but we're trying to preserve backward compat
Hello Anthony,
please pull these four patches. All were reviewed, ack'ed or signed on
qemu-devel.
Thanks,
Stefan Weil
The following changes since commit 7677e24f3db8466c7d6014a794b1e425bc7929ba:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'qemu-kvm/uq/master' into staging
(2012-06-11 12:15:52 -0500)
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:22:53PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 19:16, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/07/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> The following changes since commit
> >> 8cc9b43f7c5f826b39af4b012ad89bb55faac29c:
> >>
> >>target-microblaze: lwx/swx: first impl
On 11.06.2012 22:31, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
> Doesn't build:
>
> LINK qemu-ga
> cutils.o: In function `qemu_iovec_to_buf':
> /home/anthony/git/qemu/cutils.c:226: undefined reference to `iov_to_buf'
Indeed. I'm sorry for this. Just a makefile issue, I'm not really
sure which of the various
On 06/11/2012 12:05 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
>>> 2. Hook up this inbound BAR0 in the above patch-set to translate
>>> to mmio-regs. As this would be controller specific, a callback
>>> will be registered for translation. Now it will be upto the
>>> controller specific code on how it transla
Il 11/06/2012 17:37, Jeff Cody ha scritto:
> It sounds like Zhi Hui is working on live block commit patches, and
> Supriya is working on the bdrv_reopen() portion - I don't want to
> duplicate any effort, but if there is anything I can do to help with
> either of those areas, just let me know.
Is
On 06/11/2012 12:31 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/11/2012 06:01 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 11 June 2012 14:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
From what you said earlier, it's basically:
'write data to this address'
'read data from this address'
An i
On 06/11/2012 12:31 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/11/2012 06:01 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 11 June 2012 14:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
From what you said earlier, it's basically:
'write data to this address'
'read data from this address'
An i
On 06/07/2012 12:53 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
The following changes since commit 083dbf489d1b0592e910ecfb90b3858c23e49ab7:
target-microblaze: fix swx build breakage (2012-06-07 10:12:00 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.corpit.ru/qemu.git mjt-iov
for you to fetch
On 06/11/2012 05:14 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Anthony,
please pull one fix for xen_disk from here:
git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/qemu-dm.git for_1.1.1
The fix should be applied to the 1.1.x stable tree too.
Pulled. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jan Beulich (1):
On 06/08/2012 05:02 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Now that the tree is open, let's get trivial patches moving! Only a couple so
far...
The following changes since commit 083dbf489d1b0592e910ecfb90b3858c23e49ab7:
target-microblaze: fix swx build breakage (2012-06-07 10:12:00 +0200)
are availa
On 06/11/2012 08:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
to fix a bug in kvm PIT time synchronization and a bug in kvm apic reset.
Pulled. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On 06/08/2012 10:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hello Anthony,
To get moving with the merge of qom-next into qemu.git, now that the Makefile
PULL is in, please pull a first small batch, grouping patches directly related
to fixed-width visitors.
Outlook:
A second batch would include the QBus refa
On 06/11/2012 05:14 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Anthony,
please pull one fix for xen_disk from here:
git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/qemu-dm.git for_1.1.1
The fix should be applied to the 1.1.x stable tree too.
Pulled. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jan Beulich (1):
On 06/10/2012 07:00 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hello Anthony/Blue,
Please pull the next batch of QOM CPUState refactorings, largely cherry-picked
from qom-next queue.
The first seven patches clean up some ARM naming issues introduced by part 3.
The rest prepare ARM, Xen and target-s390 for movi
On 06/07/2012 04:30 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Here are a bunch of usb patches. There are four groups in there which
are independant and have been posted as separate series for review ~ two
weeks ago:
(1) uhci: various little fixes and improvements.
(2) usb-storage: live migration s
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:48:56 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 03:50:37PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 17:59:53 +0100
> > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
> > > +/* Global, one-time initializer to configure the rate limiting
> > > + * and initializ
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:16:09PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >The following changes since commit 8cc9b43f7c5f826b39af4b012ad89bb55faac29c:
> >
> > target-microblaze: lwx/swx: first implementation (2012-06-04 10:19:46
> > +0200)
> >
> >are
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:35:05 +0200
Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> To get moving with the merge of qom-next into qemu.git, now that the Makefile
> PULL is in, please pull a first small batch, grouping patches directly related
> to fixed-width visitors.
FWIW, the fixed-width visitors
On 06/11/2012 06:01 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 11 June 2012 14:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> From what you said earlier, it's basically:
>>>
>>> 'write data to this address'
>>> 'read data from this address'
>>>
>>> An interface that implement
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:52:46 +0800
Amos Kong wrote:
> On 07/06/12 08:26, Michael Roth wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 03:40:37PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 06:54:27 +0800
> >> Amos Kong wrote:
> >>
> >>> Currently, if define an 'enum' and use it in one command's da
On 2012-06-11 19:16, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> The following changes since commit 8cc9b43f7c5f826b39af4b012ad89bb55faac29c:
>>
>>target-microblaze: lwx/swx: first implementation (2012-06-04 10:19:46
>> +0200)
>>
>> are available in the git re
Lluís Vilanova writes:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova
>>> ---
>>> monitor.c | 15 ---
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
>>> index 89
On 06/07/2012 11:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
The following changes since commit 8cc9b43f7c5f826b39af4b012ad89bb55faac29c:
target-microblaze: lwx/swx: first implementation (2012-06-04 10:19:46 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qe
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:03:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 09:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >On 11 June 2012 15:38, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>>Ideally the interface used by DMA controllers should be identic
On 06/11/2012 10:24 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 11.06.2012 14:09, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
On 06/08/2012 12:11 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.06.2012 16:32, schrieb Jeff Cody:
>>
On 11 June 2012 16:03, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 09:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> In hardware (at least for AXI) they're the same thing. A DMA
>> controller is a bus master, just like a CPU. They don't care
>> whether the slave is RAM or a device, they're just issuing
>> memory trans
block: GlusterFS helpers to interface with libglusterfs
From: Bharata B Rao
This patch does two things:
- Adds GlusterFS specific init routines that enable QEMU to load
volume file and load necessary translators.
- Implements routines like gluster_open(), gluster_read(), gluster_write()
and
On 06/11/2012 09:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 11 June 2012 15:38, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Ideally the interface used by DMA controllers should be identical to
the interface used by CPUs to talk to the rest of the system: it's
ex
On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 11 June 2012 14:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
From what you said earlier, it's basically:
'write data to this address'
'read data from this address'
An interface that implements this is DMAContext. Forget about the fact that
'DMA' is in the name.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 03:53:23PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 15:38, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Ideally the interface used by DMA controllers should be identical to
> >> the interface used by CPUs to talk to t
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Harsh Bora wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 08:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
>> wrote:
>>> @@ -75,16 +96,22 @@ static char *trace_file_name = NULL;
>>> *
>>> * Returns false if the record is not valid.
>>> */
>>
On 11 June 2012 15:38, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Ideally the interface used by DMA controllers should be identical to
>> the interface used by CPUs to talk to the rest of the system: it's
>> exactly the same bus interface in hardwa
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>>> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visibl
Am 11.06.2012 15:21, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 06/11/2012 03:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 10.06.2012 19:38, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>> Am 10.06.2012 17:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 08/06/2012 03:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>
>> +typedef enum ObjectState {
>> +OBJEC
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:39:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 14:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > From what you said earlier, it's basically:
> >
> > 'write data to this address'
> > 'read data from this address'
> >
> > An interface that implements this is DMAContext. Forget abo
block: gluster as block backend
From: Bharata B Rao
This patch adds gluster as the new block backend in QEMU. This gives QEMU
the ability to boot VM images from gluster volumes.
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao
---
Makefile.objs |2
block/gluster.c | 435 +
Hi,
This set of patches enables QEMU to boot VM images from gluster volumes.
This is achieved by adding gluster as a new block backend driver in QEMU.
Its already possible to boot from VM images on gluster volumes using Fuse
mount, but this patchset provides the ability to boot VM images from glus
qemu: Add a config option for GlusterFS as block backend
From: Bharata B Rao
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao
---
configure | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index b55a792..dc89592 100755
--- a/confi
I was "beached", sorry for the late reply.
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07.06.2012, at 05:10, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/07/2012 06:56 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 01:56:52 AM Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>> The other one (FIPS) is basically a list o
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>>> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>>>
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Provides a generic event state description and a more det
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
>> property but we're trying to preserve backwar
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.06.2012 14:09, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2012 12:11 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 08.06.2012 16:32, schrieb Jeff Cody:
> On 06/08/2012 09:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
> property but we're trying to preserve backward compatibility. This
> command-line will break:
>
> x86_64
Hello,
'am having some issues trying to live migrate a large guest and would
like to get some pointers
on how to go about about debugging this. Here is some info. on the
configuration
_Hardware :_
Two DL980's each with 80 Westmere cores + 1 TB of RAM. Using a 10G NIC
private link
(back to
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
Provides a generic event state description and a more detailed event
control and
query interface.
Il 11/06/2012 15:17, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>
>> I think AXI counts as a point-to-point link, so no bus.
>>
>> In my prop-ptr branch you can find some code (untested beyond
>> compilation)
>> that tried to model AXI using interfaces
>> (git://github.com/pbonzini/qemu.git).
>
> s/pbonzin
On 11 June 2012 14:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> From what you said earlier, it's basically:
>
> 'write data to this address'
> 'read data from this address'
>
> An interface that implements this is DMAContext. Forget about the fact that
> 'DMA' is in the name. It's really the symmetric version o
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git uq/master
to fix a bug in kvm PIT time synchronization and a bug in kvm apic reset.
Jan Kiszka (1):
kvm: i8254: Fix conversion of in-kernel to userspace s
On 11 June 2012 14:12, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I really don't see the overwhelming need to keep structures private. Being
> able to directly reference public members is extremely handy.
It keeps people honest. Last time I looked at your pin series it had
some changes which were using private in
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:46:31PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Tue) 05 Jun 2012 [17:54:30], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/05/2012 05:41 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> > >On (Mon) 04 Jun 2012 [19:04:41], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >>On 05/26/2012 04:20 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> > >>>On (Fri) 25 May 2012 [
On 06/11/2012 03:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.06.2012 19:38, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 10.06.2012 17:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 08/06/2012 03:19, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
+typedef enum ObjectState {
+OBJECT_STATE_INITIALIZED = 1,
+OBJECT_STATE_REALIZED,
+} ObjectState;
I th
On 06/11/2012 12:54 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Ive had a brief look at the refactorings on qom-next, I notice that
busses are now just children of the parent object TYPE_BUS.
Essentially for point-to-point links this means that link itself
has a QOM object. So for finer clarification, for new busse
On 06/08/2012 08:24 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/08/2012 12:23 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi all,
Im looking to QOMifying and refactoring the AXI stream interfaces
between the AXI ethernet and AXI DMA modules. I could use some
g
On 06/11/2012 02:20 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 11/06/2012 09:13, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
+The first step is to move your device struct definition to a header file. This
+header file should only contain the struct definition and any preprocessor
+declarations you need to define the structure
Am 09.06.2012 14:12, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> Convert uses of FLOPPY_ERROR to either FLOPPY_DPRINTF
> (for implemented cases) or to use LOG_UNIMP (unimplemented).
>
> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl
Acked-by: Kevin Wolf
On 11 June 2012 08:13, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.06.2012 12:00, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> I don't think this is a fantastic idea -- the device struct should be
>> private to the device, and having it in a standalone header file is
>> asking for users of the device to illicitly include it and a
On 11 June 2012 06:54, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I think AXI counts as a point-to-point link, so no bus.
Depends what you mean by AXI. In general an AXI bus fabric
can have multiple masters and slaves connected via an
interconnect, but we probably don't actually want to model
the interconnect as a s
Il 11/06/2012 14:44, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> > @@ -1048,6 +1078,7 @@ static const struct {
>> > [ 0x5a ] = { cmd_mode_sense, /* (10) */ 0 },
>> > [ 0xa8 ] = { cmd_read, /* (12) */ CHECK_READY },
>> > [ 0xad ] = { cmd_read_dvd_structure,CHECK_READY
Am 11.06.2012 14:09, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 12:11 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 08.06.2012 16:32, schrieb Jeff Cody:
On 06/08/2012 09:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
Am 11.06.2012 07:24, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> This command is not necessary for CD-ROM and DVD-ROM, but some versions of
> udev trip on its absence.
>
> Cc: Kevin Wolf
> Cc: Markus Armbruster
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> Kevin, ok to merge these ATAPI changes via the SCSI tree
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:b...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 4:32 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal: PCI/PCIe: inbound BAR0 emulation for P
On 06/07/2012 08:02 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
A newer tracelog format which gets rid of fixed size trace records and
therefore allows to trace multiple arguments as well as strings in trace
events.
Sample trace:
v9fs_version 0.000 t
Am 28.05.2012 00:53, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> accept() expects address_len to point to the length of the sockaddr on
> input. Initialize it accordingly.
>
> Resolves an assertion due to EFAULT on illumos.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
Ping? Verifiable by looking at the Linux man page.
/-F
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Each string which is shown during readline completion in the QEMU monitor
> is allocated dynamically but currently never deallocated.
>
> Add the missing loop which calls g_free for the allocated strings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
> ---
>
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 12:11 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 08.06.2012 16:32, schrieb Jeff Cody:
>>> On 06/08/2012 09:53 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 08:42 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>>> Provides a generic event state description and a more detailed event
>>> control and
>>> query interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova
>>> --
On 06/11/2012 01:29 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 12:07, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 06/06/2012 05:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Due to a offset between the clock used to generate the in-kernel
>>> count_load_time (CLOCK_MONOTONIC) and the clock used for processing this
>>> in userspace (vm_cloc
Hello, I have succefull run debian raspberry pi under qemu.
Then I try do like under my x86, mount -t proc none proc,..., chroot
/mnt/gentoo /bin/bash, ... -> illegal instruction.
Then I try with boot directly from the gentoo's part -> lot of illegal
instruction, I have used like say on the web:
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
